From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed primary source content

I forgot to say it in the edit summary, but I removed primary source content. [1] Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 20:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply

No citations or explanations

E.g., the midwifery "controversy." No degree details. Fundamental question: why included in Wikipedia?

Controversy

A recent editor seems insistent on removing this section. Can we discuss to gain consensus on whether it is appropriate to keep or be removed?   Eyer contact  16:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The text in question is: "In May 2018, it was reported that Loudon had used inflammatory and derogatory language against women, Muslims and Democrats. He repeated conspiracy theories about President Obama's birth and religion, suggesting that Obama was a Kenyan-born Muslim. [1]"   Eyer contact  21:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Certainly seems relevant to me. BubbaJoe123456 ( talk) 21:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ BubbaJoe123456: The editor in question has removed this content again, without engaging in conversation here. I am new enough to be unsure what appropriate next steps should be. Thoughts?   Eyer contact  18:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The editor has been listed at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#John William Loudon. Britishfinance ( talk) 10:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ McDermott, Nathan; Kaczynski, Andrew; Massie, Chris (May 21, 2018). "Policy adviser for Trump-linked group called Obama 'Islamchurian candidate,' joked about 'crack whore Dem voter'". CNN. Retrieved May 21, 2018.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removed primary source content

I forgot to say it in the edit summary, but I removed primary source content. [1] Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 20:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply

No citations or explanations

E.g., the midwifery "controversy." No degree details. Fundamental question: why included in Wikipedia?

Controversy

A recent editor seems insistent on removing this section. Can we discuss to gain consensus on whether it is appropriate to keep or be removed?   Eyer contact  16:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The text in question is: "In May 2018, it was reported that Loudon had used inflammatory and derogatory language against women, Muslims and Democrats. He repeated conspiracy theories about President Obama's birth and religion, suggesting that Obama was a Kenyan-born Muslim. [1]"   Eyer contact  21:51, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Certainly seems relevant to me. BubbaJoe123456 ( talk) 21:58, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply
@ BubbaJoe123456: The editor in question has removed this content again, without engaging in conversation here. I am new enough to be unsure what appropriate next steps should be. Thoughts?   Eyer contact  18:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The editor has been listed at the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#John William Loudon. Britishfinance ( talk) 10:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ McDermott, Nathan; Kaczynski, Andrew; Massie, Chris (May 21, 2018). "Policy adviser for Trump-linked group called Obama 'Islamchurian candidate,' joked about 'crack whore Dem voter'". CNN. Retrieved May 21, 2018.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook