From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kelley investigation

It seems grossly weighted to place such a prominent reference to the Kelley investigation in the intro to this article. Allen has served in the military for almost four decades and the reference currently takes up about 40% of the intro. I would suggest it be pared down or even better deleted altogether, until (and if) the investigation has some effect on his career in the long term. Wolfhound1000 ( talk) 21:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Panetta delays appointment

"On November 13, 2012 Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that Allen's nomination for SACEUR would be "delayed." News agencies reported that Allen's communications with Jill Kelley, a Tampa woman who was friends with Allen's predecessor as top commander in Afghanistan, David Petraeus, were under investigation. Petraeus had resigned as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency four days earlier.[4]" Also, "The official said 20,000 to 30,000 pages of emails and other documents from Allen’s communications with Kelley between 2010 and 2012 are under review...." Some serious 'splainin in order.

Should this not be put into a Scandal section? A tsunami of information is approaching and a new section would be appropriate. Could a more experienced editor comment and address? -- Wikipietime ( talk) 13:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Date format

This article uses a mix of month–day–year date format (e.g., "born December 15, 1953") and day–month–year format (e.g., "On 13 September 2014 ..."). There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers § RfC: What does DATETIES mean for articles on US military personnel? seeking to clarify which date format should apply to articles such as this. sroc  💬 08:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Never saw any action

The General never saw any action, and never fired a single shot in his entire career. This should be included in Wikipedia. 173.65.234.214 ( talk) 03:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John R. Allen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John R. Allen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kelley investigation

It seems grossly weighted to place such a prominent reference to the Kelley investigation in the intro to this article. Allen has served in the military for almost four decades and the reference currently takes up about 40% of the intro. I would suggest it be pared down or even better deleted altogether, until (and if) the investigation has some effect on his career in the long term. Wolfhound1000 ( talk) 21:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Panetta delays appointment

"On November 13, 2012 Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that Allen's nomination for SACEUR would be "delayed." News agencies reported that Allen's communications with Jill Kelley, a Tampa woman who was friends with Allen's predecessor as top commander in Afghanistan, David Petraeus, were under investigation. Petraeus had resigned as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency four days earlier.[4]" Also, "The official said 20,000 to 30,000 pages of emails and other documents from Allen’s communications with Kelley between 2010 and 2012 are under review...." Some serious 'splainin in order.

Should this not be put into a Scandal section? A tsunami of information is approaching and a new section would be appropriate. Could a more experienced editor comment and address? -- Wikipietime ( talk) 13:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Date format

This article uses a mix of month–day–year date format (e.g., "born December 15, 1953") and day–month–year format (e.g., "On 13 September 2014 ..."). There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers § RfC: What does DATETIES mean for articles on US military personnel? seeking to clarify which date format should apply to articles such as this. sroc  💬 08:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Never saw any action

The General never saw any action, and never fired a single shot in his entire career. This should be included in Wikipedia. 173.65.234.214 ( talk) 03:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John R. Allen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John R. Allen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook