This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Exodus Movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If  consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Exodus Movement. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Exodus Movement at the Reference desk.

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances) You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Further information Enforcement procedures: Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance. Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your edit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established. The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Judaism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I dont have privilege to edit the page, but TheExodusMovement.com is not the website associated with this entity and is completely separate. FEC filings show Exodus Movement is part of something called Red Sea Rising PAC and no relation to this initial push for Jews to leave the democratic party. The Exodus Movement wiki page also goes into detail with sources about how this is not attached — Preceding unsigned comment added by StarKB1985 ( talk • contribs) 20:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC) reply

According to The New York Times The Exodus Movement is Jexodus, rebranded [1]. Perhaps the articles should be merged? Now I see there is a dispute about whether they are independent or not, withdrawn suggestion to merge. ☆ Bri ( talk) 20:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Bri: see below. Doug Weller talk 20:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Is "Jexodus" limited to leaving a political party, or does it extend to leaving Judaism or perceived liberalizing core doctrines of Judaism altogether? Hyperbolick ( talk) 14:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

The donation page says "Jexodus has applied to the IRS for 501(c)(3) status. Donations will be tax-deductible if the IRS approves our application for tax-exempt status. We expect the IRS to approve our application, but we may have to wait several months for an answer. If approved, our tax-exempt status would be retroactive to March 5, 2019. Any donations made after that date would be tax-deductible to the extent allowable on your 2019 tax return. Our attorneys assure us that it is common for a new charity to accept donations while its IRS application is pending."

I don't see how the website relates to this article. Doug Weller talk 17:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

• Did you see this page? Drmies ( talk) 17:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict) :Ha. A search for Jexodus never again turned up a subpage. [2]. That leads to a mission page: "Jexodus is a non-partisan nonprofit that unites people of good will – regardless of faith, ethnicity, identity, and political affiliation – around the simple, formerly non-controversial idea that Anti-Semitism must never be mainstreamed by the media or by any political party." There's a resolution also. [3] This is a mess, as this article says Jexodus is trying to get Jews to skip parties and the website denies that. {{re|Drmies|| what do you think? Doug Weller talk 17:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

And I've used one of his sources there that says: "Jexodus may have gotten the hint on the name. On Thursday, its leaders announced that they were rebranding it “the Exodus Movement,” an initiative of Red Sea Rising, incorporated by Ms. Pipko as a tax-exempt “social welfare” organization. On Wednesday afternoon, the Jexodus.org website was taken down; a new one, TheExodusMovement.com, went live on Thursday." It looks as though someone else has taken over the website. Doug Weller talk 17:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC) It needs a rename to The Exodus Movement though. Doug Weller talk 17:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply

• I agree with renaming. Drmies ( talk) 21:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Comment - if the consensus is to rename, this article should be moved to the new title. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• Move this should be a no brainer. To make this particular article accurately reflect its website, I've had to add an edit that contradicts the rest of the article, ie that it has a nonpartisan mission to fight antisemitism. Nothing to do with leaving or joining a party. I was about to file a move request but hopefully that won't be necessary. I really should have been a merge as we'll probably want some material from the The Exodus Movement article. Doug Weller talk 19:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC) reply
• I think Move makes more sense as I've stated elsewhere. But at a minimum renaming this page to The Exodus Movement instead of saying "Jexodus, aka TheExodusMovement.com" because thats blatantly incorrect. And put information from the Exodus Movement wiki page into here. If you go to Jexodus donate page you see this message "Please note that Jexodus was a 2020 ARI project. The jexodus.org/donate URL will direct all donations to ARI." If you go to TheExodusMovement.com website you see that it's "Paid for by Red Sea Rising PAC." They dont have the same disclaimers and it appears based on the word "was" the Jexodus group isnt active while The Exodus Movement has activity as late as 24 hours ago?. StarKB1985 ( talk) 13:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC) reply
• Support, for a name change. The organization/initiative didn't keep the name Jexodus but for a month. It has been known as The Exodus Movement for over two years now. Time to change the page name. Platonk ( talk) 19:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Doesn’t seem to ever have been listed at Wikipedia:requested moves. Hyperbolick ( talk) 21:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC) reply
    • @ Hyperbolick: I have a request in to change the permissions of this page so I can make an edit to it, showing the name change (with citations). Then I'll put in a request to change the name or move. Platonk ( talk) 21:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC) reply
      • Seems the thing to do, yes. I'd support it. Hyperbolick ( talk) 22:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC) reply
        • @ Hyperbolick: I got the page name changed, and re-arranged some of the info. Let me know what you think. Platonk ( talk) 02:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply
          • Yes, very good. Hyperbolick ( talk) 22:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply