This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are two topics possibly at hand here:
I suppose some people might like to muddy the waters by adding some verbiage to this vaccine page. Heathhunnicutt 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
This is a better written version. I suggest going back to it, then adding a few things from there: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jeryl_Lynn&oldid=54807739 (Comment entered by Midgley ( talk · contribs · count), regarding previous version also written by him.)
Is it true that Dr. Hilleman was involved in vaccine research prior to cultivating the virus? That needs a reference. Heathhunnicutt 00:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Probably http://www.aspeninstitute.org/atf/cf/%7BDEB6F227-659B-4EC8-8F84-8DF23CA704F5%7D/shillemn.jpeg
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/site/c.huLWJeMRKpH/b.612937/k.123E/1999_TripleCrown_Class.htm
http://investor.symyx.com/downloads/bio_hilleman.jpg
Although nothing is made of it there. I suppose it would be polite to mention this article to her, and check. Midgley 19:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
THe article isn't greatly improved - for instance, why was Dr Hilleman able to culture Mumps virus from her throat? I don't see removing "contracted mumps" as helping the reader. As for the truth of the statement - it would be reasonable to follow the link given for her father to find out what he was doing then, and later. Several of these remarks are quite rude, and converting the redirect from JLH's name to this article into blank article, and then proposing to speedy it as a page does not seem helpful to me. I think we had best have a thid opinion on this - who would you like to ask?
Midgley 01:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Too many too small too repetitive. A maze of tiny articles, all alike. Bring the trademark name article and any more on specific preparations of JLV into here. Easier to read. Reduces duplication. 02:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC) (Comment entered by Midgley ( talk · contribs · count))
A number of scientists, researchers and doctors have expressed serious concerns about lack of access to single jabs, due to the potential for immune interference related to the timing of vaccinations, the extreme crowding of vaccination schedule. The lack of single jab alternatives to combination vaccinations would allow more time for immune system recovery from adverse vaccube reactions, immune interference, and natural exposure to diseases. A new wave of reports indicates that individuals with family histories of unusual reactions to certain diseases or vaccines may be particularly prone to neurological damage caused by combination vaccines, including the MMR, which includes the Jeryl Lynn vaccine. Removal of any mention in this article of the controversies swirling in every direction around the Jeryl Lynn vaccine would seem to be contrary to the very notion of npov and informed consent. Rather than eliminating all reference to the controversies entirely, perhaps it would be best to at least mention that the Jeryl Lynn vaccine is part of the single jab alternative to the MMR, and is being recommended by a growing minority doctors who are especially cautious when it comes to the principle of avoiding harm to the patient, a tenet viewed by some as the first priority of medicine. Ombudsman 22:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
There are two topics possibly at hand here:
I suppose some people might like to muddy the waters by adding some verbiage to this vaccine page. Heathhunnicutt 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
This is a better written version. I suggest going back to it, then adding a few things from there: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jeryl_Lynn&oldid=54807739 (Comment entered by Midgley ( talk · contribs · count), regarding previous version also written by him.)
Is it true that Dr. Hilleman was involved in vaccine research prior to cultivating the virus? That needs a reference. Heathhunnicutt 00:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Probably http://www.aspeninstitute.org/atf/cf/%7BDEB6F227-659B-4EC8-8F84-8DF23CA704F5%7D/shillemn.jpeg
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/site/c.huLWJeMRKpH/b.612937/k.123E/1999_TripleCrown_Class.htm
http://investor.symyx.com/downloads/bio_hilleman.jpg
Although nothing is made of it there. I suppose it would be polite to mention this article to her, and check. Midgley 19:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
THe article isn't greatly improved - for instance, why was Dr Hilleman able to culture Mumps virus from her throat? I don't see removing "contracted mumps" as helping the reader. As for the truth of the statement - it would be reasonable to follow the link given for her father to find out what he was doing then, and later. Several of these remarks are quite rude, and converting the redirect from JLH's name to this article into blank article, and then proposing to speedy it as a page does not seem helpful to me. I think we had best have a thid opinion on this - who would you like to ask?
Midgley 01:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Too many too small too repetitive. A maze of tiny articles, all alike. Bring the trademark name article and any more on specific preparations of JLV into here. Easier to read. Reduces duplication. 02:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC) (Comment entered by Midgley ( talk · contribs · count))
A number of scientists, researchers and doctors have expressed serious concerns about lack of access to single jabs, due to the potential for immune interference related to the timing of vaccinations, the extreme crowding of vaccination schedule. The lack of single jab alternatives to combination vaccinations would allow more time for immune system recovery from adverse vaccube reactions, immune interference, and natural exposure to diseases. A new wave of reports indicates that individuals with family histories of unusual reactions to certain diseases or vaccines may be particularly prone to neurological damage caused by combination vaccines, including the MMR, which includes the Jeryl Lynn vaccine. Removal of any mention in this article of the controversies swirling in every direction around the Jeryl Lynn vaccine would seem to be contrary to the very notion of npov and informed consent. Rather than eliminating all reference to the controversies entirely, perhaps it would be best to at least mention that the Jeryl Lynn vaccine is part of the single jab alternative to the MMR, and is being recommended by a growing minority doctors who are especially cautious when it comes to the principle of avoiding harm to the patient, a tenet viewed by some as the first priority of medicine. Ombudsman 22:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)