This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. United States: Dartmouth Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance). Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The fact is that Megan McTavish's second tenure on AMC was incredibly unpopular, and surprisingly so noting the popularity of her first and third tenures. I don't see how it's a POV-issue. I think that without little notes like these, reminding people of what was going on behind the scenes at the time, only stand to make articles more interesting.

Juppiter 19:47, 16 May 2005 (UTC) reply

I think it's really an issue of "are internet posters and magazine readers the entirety of fans"? I'm sure there are other fans, who may number a large sum, who don't pay attention to writers, or internet, or magazines, and think "their show" is just fine. Mike H. That's hot 08:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC) reply