Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Hi. I reviewed this article for GA and find that it fulfils the criteria. A Nice article on a Kentucky politician. — Mattisse ( Talk) 18:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b ( MoS): Follows MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c ( OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Congradulations!

— Mattisse ( Talk) 18:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC) reply