From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Everything checks out. Just a few minor copy changes and a suggestion from your bilingual reviewer. 7-day hold to Krisgabwoosh. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 23:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

  • until end add a "the"
  • social communication I'm half wondering if this should read public relations instead of being a literal translation of comunicación social. Would this merit, maybe, {{ tooltip}}?
  • is "State media" supposed to have a capital S here? probably not
  • I've grown accustomed to capitalizing "state" when referring to it in the institutional sense (i.e. separation of Church and State). It's a bit ambiguous here, though, so I've decapitalized it. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 01:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Other items

  • References are archived.
  • Earwig shows no copyright violations.
  • Images need alt text.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 23:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Everything checks out. Just a few minor copy changes and a suggestion from your bilingual reviewer. 7-day hold to Krisgabwoosh. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 23:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

  • until end add a "the"
  • social communication I'm half wondering if this should read public relations instead of being a literal translation of comunicación social. Would this merit, maybe, {{ tooltip}}?
  • is "State media" supposed to have a capital S here? probably not
  • I've grown accustomed to capitalizing "state" when referring to it in the institutional sense (i.e. separation of Church and State). It's a bit ambiguous here, though, so I've decapitalized it. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 01:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Other items

  • References are archived.
  • Earwig shows no copyright violations.
  • Images need alt text.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook