The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will complete this review within one week.
One issue I immediately see is ref. 42 (ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2024 Singles) is missing a URL in the citation. - Riley1012 ( talk) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check shows similarities between the article and other websites because of the song quotes used, but the actual prose of the article does not appear to be copied from another source. The references are reliable, and there are no unsourced claims.
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused in its coverage.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its coverage of the song.
5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.
6. Illustrated
The image in this article is free to use and has a relevant caption. The audio file is fair use and has a relevant caption.
The CS1 error mentioned above has already been addressed. All that is left to be corrected are a few minor prose issues, which I can do myself. I will go ahead and pass this article, well done @ Ippantekina and @ Gained! - Riley1012 ( talk) 18:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I will complete this review within one week.
One issue I immediately see is ref. 42 (ARIA Charts – Accreditations – 2024 Singles) is missing a URL in the citation. - Riley1012 ( talk) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check shows similarities between the article and other websites because of the song quotes used, but the actual prose of the article does not appear to be copied from another source. The references are reliable, and there are no unsourced claims.
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused in its coverage.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral in its coverage of the song.
5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.
6. Illustrated
The image in this article is free to use and has a relevant caption. The audio file is fair use and has a relevant caption.
The CS1 error mentioned above has already been addressed. All that is left to be corrected are a few minor prose issues, which I can do myself. I will go ahead and pass this article, well done @ Ippantekina and @ Gained! - Riley1012 ( talk) 18:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)