This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on February 17 2008. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
There was a concern expressed in the nomination for deletion that there was a lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources for the conference itself. I believe the following two references meet that criteria. If anyone concurs, feel free to add material to the article. If anyone disagrees, please point to examples of what is meant by “substantial coverage”.
The Goodstein and Simon stuff is good and can stay, everything else is poorly-sourced and needs to go. I think that gives us a few salvagable sentences. Merge that into the CF article and we have a reasonable way forward I think. Alexbrn talk| contribs| COI 04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Besides the ongoing AfD debate, I propose renaming the article to International Conferences on Cold Fusion. The name "International Conference on Cold Fusion" appears to be much more notable than the "official" name of the most recent conferences. Any thoughts? -- Edcolins ( talk) 14:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
[1] 19:55, 14 January 2015 Edcolins Undid revision 642433982 by 84.106.11.117
It is also mentioned on conferance page [2] and mentioned on proceedings index [3]
84.106.11.117 ( talk) 21:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on February 17 2008. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
There was a concern expressed in the nomination for deletion that there was a lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources for the conference itself. I believe the following two references meet that criteria. If anyone concurs, feel free to add material to the article. If anyone disagrees, please point to examples of what is meant by “substantial coverage”.
The Goodstein and Simon stuff is good and can stay, everything else is poorly-sourced and needs to go. I think that gives us a few salvagable sentences. Merge that into the CF article and we have a reasonable way forward I think. Alexbrn talk| contribs| COI 04:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Besides the ongoing AfD debate, I propose renaming the article to International Conferences on Cold Fusion. The name "International Conference on Cold Fusion" appears to be much more notable than the "official" name of the most recent conferences. Any thoughts? -- Edcolins ( talk) 14:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
[1] 19:55, 14 January 2015 Edcolins Undid revision 642433982 by 84.106.11.117
It is also mentioned on conferance page [2] and mentioned on proceedings index [3]
84.106.11.117 ( talk) 21:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)