From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Band break-up

I don't know if anyone who edits this page reads this or not, but please stop adding that the band broke up, that they announced it on MySpace, that it was because the guitarist left, etc. etc. The date and reason for the break-up is been mentioned at least twice in this article already. BrianFG 10:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Non replaceable image? and The band broke up?

Should that image be deleted? The tag says it would have been gotten rid of months ago.

Also, they're playing tonight in Jacksonville, NC ( http://www.myspace.com/hooligansmusichall). Are they only temporarily reunited, what's the deal with that? ZachPG 18:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Genre

I have removed the genre deathcore... they are a metalcore band. Nothing else. 130.194.13.103 ( talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008

- agreed, not deathcore. stop adding it Agent0range2 ( talk) 17:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

-i am confused- it says they r coming back together, is this true or a hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.245.136 ( talk) 06:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply

They are definitely deathcore on their last CD cause deathcore has alot to do with vocal style and Butcher definitely presents it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearsonist ( talkcontribs) 20:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Upon the deathcore sound on their latest album is definitely correct in a certain manner, however, due to Ed not using clean vocals at all, but clean singing is used in passages in some songs on the album such as "Say Goodbye" and they still keep their metalcore roots, so metalcore and deathcore would be generally correct in the genre section of the album, among some songs having an avid death metal sound such as the opening track "Sharks in Your Mouth". But they are a metalcore band, I am only implying that Music for the Recently Deceased has a deathcore sound upon heard in some songs. GunMetal Angel 21:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC) reply

What's going on here?

Can someone explain to me why practically the entire article is being hidden? Even if it's unreferenced, it doesn't mean you have to hide the whole thing. We have tags for this. FireCrystal ( talk) 00:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Tags like
? -- Jeandré, 2009-03-29 t19:35z
I don't think any of the content is actually harmful to its integrity. It is not hurting the article in any way. I think the template above more accurately refers to individual musicians if you will rather than the entire band. Though after another look, I've seen some sentences that could be removed. Have you ever thought that the basis of this was on their official site? or on official biographies around the net? I know telling you won't source this this article but I have no strong feelings about this article either way. I thought I'll say one last thing. Do as you wish. FireCrystal ( talk) 19:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Jeandré and whoever else seems to be overlooking this excuse for an article, this isn't helping anyone. Jeandré I see you have a long history on Wikipedia and after a very quick squizz, it seems that you seem to like(?) patrolling around deleting 'unsourced' claims. Now doing that is one thing (to a point, I agree with it, but would not do it myself), to totally deface an article, leaving it with no integrity, no content... that's is just plain pointless. You can parade around deleting articles all you like, but you cannot sit there thinking for a second that it is helping the project in any way. I arrive at this page, having previously seen it was empty a while back, with the intention of getting it to a decent standard, now I have to trawl through the history to find an article that just needs sources - or go and find the info all over again. Leaving it empty, with the main piece of information being a set list that is in no way notable - Why, I ask you, why? The amount of times the page has been deleted, I'm sure you could have just opened up Google and given the page some sort of... well, some sort of something, anything. k.i.a.c ( talktome - contribs) 09:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Have referenced the discography (as I removed the hide tags before, which I only did because as the two albums are linked to the article and list the release date in their infoboxes I thought that was justification enough). I'm still confused why the information was hidden rather than tagging it unsourced (am I missing where it says to hide this sort of thing on an article in Wikipedia:Verifiability?) -- Tangerineduel ( talk) 12:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply

2009?

Jona made this statement with his Myspace "we are back together. we just arent doing anything at the moment. we just did a tour, released a dvd, now have new merch. more news soon to come guys Jona" so i think it would be appropriate to fix the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesterowens ( talkcontribs) 16:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on I Killed the Prom Queen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Band break-up

I don't know if anyone who edits this page reads this or not, but please stop adding that the band broke up, that they announced it on MySpace, that it was because the guitarist left, etc. etc. The date and reason for the break-up is been mentioned at least twice in this article already. BrianFG 10:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Non replaceable image? and The band broke up?

Should that image be deleted? The tag says it would have been gotten rid of months ago.

Also, they're playing tonight in Jacksonville, NC ( http://www.myspace.com/hooligansmusichall). Are they only temporarily reunited, what's the deal with that? ZachPG 18:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Genre

I have removed the genre deathcore... they are a metalcore band. Nothing else. 130.194.13.103 ( talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008

- agreed, not deathcore. stop adding it Agent0range2 ( talk) 17:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC) reply

-i am confused- it says they r coming back together, is this true or a hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.245.136 ( talk) 06:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC) reply

They are definitely deathcore on their last CD cause deathcore has alot to do with vocal style and Butcher definitely presents it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearsonist ( talkcontribs) 20:34, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Upon the deathcore sound on their latest album is definitely correct in a certain manner, however, due to Ed not using clean vocals at all, but clean singing is used in passages in some songs on the album such as "Say Goodbye" and they still keep their metalcore roots, so metalcore and deathcore would be generally correct in the genre section of the album, among some songs having an avid death metal sound such as the opening track "Sharks in Your Mouth". But they are a metalcore band, I am only implying that Music for the Recently Deceased has a deathcore sound upon heard in some songs. GunMetal Angel 21:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC) reply

What's going on here?

Can someone explain to me why practically the entire article is being hidden? Even if it's unreferenced, it doesn't mean you have to hide the whole thing. We have tags for this. FireCrystal ( talk) 00:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Tags like
? -- Jeandré, 2009-03-29 t19:35z
I don't think any of the content is actually harmful to its integrity. It is not hurting the article in any way. I think the template above more accurately refers to individual musicians if you will rather than the entire band. Though after another look, I've seen some sentences that could be removed. Have you ever thought that the basis of this was on their official site? or on official biographies around the net? I know telling you won't source this this article but I have no strong feelings about this article either way. I thought I'll say one last thing. Do as you wish. FireCrystal ( talk) 19:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC) reply
Jeandré and whoever else seems to be overlooking this excuse for an article, this isn't helping anyone. Jeandré I see you have a long history on Wikipedia and after a very quick squizz, it seems that you seem to like(?) patrolling around deleting 'unsourced' claims. Now doing that is one thing (to a point, I agree with it, but would not do it myself), to totally deface an article, leaving it with no integrity, no content... that's is just plain pointless. You can parade around deleting articles all you like, but you cannot sit there thinking for a second that it is helping the project in any way. I arrive at this page, having previously seen it was empty a while back, with the intention of getting it to a decent standard, now I have to trawl through the history to find an article that just needs sources - or go and find the info all over again. Leaving it empty, with the main piece of information being a set list that is in no way notable - Why, I ask you, why? The amount of times the page has been deleted, I'm sure you could have just opened up Google and given the page some sort of... well, some sort of something, anything. k.i.a.c ( talktome - contribs) 09:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Have referenced the discography (as I removed the hide tags before, which I only did because as the two albums are linked to the article and list the release date in their infoboxes I thought that was justification enough). I'm still confused why the information was hidden rather than tagging it unsourced (am I missing where it says to hide this sort of thing on an article in Wikipedia:Verifiability?) -- Tangerineduel ( talk) 12:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC) reply

2009?

Jona made this statement with his Myspace "we are back together. we just arent doing anything at the moment. we just did a tour, released a dvd, now have new merch. more news soon to come guys Jona" so i think it would be appropriate to fix the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesterowens ( talkcontribs) 16:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on I Killed the Prom Queen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook