From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can we use the IEEE summary description?

It's short, to the point of the article, clearly attributed, and does not hurt the value of the magazine, so I think it should be allowed in the same manner as a low-res cover picture. If there is a specific reason this seems like not fair use, please help me out and discuss here, since I commonly include quotes to indicate a view is not original research... LouScheffer 23:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I dunno . . . In this case, it's about 40% of the entire article. Can it be paraphrased? That would moot the issue. --  But| seriously| folks  08:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply

A plea for a cleanup and rewrite

I'm an editor at IEEE Spectrum: there's a lot of stuff that's factually incorrect here, so as per Wikipedia guidelines I'm making a plea for some edits. In particular, article submission to IEEE Spectrum is not open access. Individuals and corporations do not have the right to post their IEEE-copyrighted materials on their own servers without express permission. And while we do have a peer review process for our feature articles, news and other articles are not peer reviewed. Also the statement "Additional content is gleaned from several hundred annual international conferences," is misleading: we do attend many conferences over the course of the year, but not several hundred of them. We use a mix of freelance and expert authors alongside staff-written pieces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.141.58 ( talk) 00:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can we use the IEEE summary description?

It's short, to the point of the article, clearly attributed, and does not hurt the value of the magazine, so I think it should be allowed in the same manner as a low-res cover picture. If there is a specific reason this seems like not fair use, please help me out and discuss here, since I commonly include quotes to indicate a view is not original research... LouScheffer 23:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I dunno . . . In this case, it's about 40% of the entire article. Can it be paraphrased? That would moot the issue. --  But| seriously| folks  08:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply

A plea for a cleanup and rewrite

I'm an editor at IEEE Spectrum: there's a lot of stuff that's factually incorrect here, so as per Wikipedia guidelines I'm making a plea for some edits. In particular, article submission to IEEE Spectrum is not open access. Individuals and corporations do not have the right to post their IEEE-copyrighted materials on their own servers without express permission. And while we do have a peer review process for our feature articles, news and other articles are not peer reviewed. Also the statement "Additional content is gleaned from several hundred annual international conferences," is misleading: we do attend many conferences over the course of the year, but not several hundred of them. We use a mix of freelance and expert authors alongside staff-written pieces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.141.58 ( talk) 00:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook