This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Hubert Chevis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 March 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Would this Manchurian partridge be the same bird as the Daurian Partridge? Ericoides ( talk) 07:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The article reference to this programme seems to give undue weight to what is pretty much a gag; it makes it seem that the conclusion is drawn as part of the investigation in the course of the show, when it is delivered as a non-sequitur joke which he immediately undermines by saying that he’s probably reading too much into it. A far more interesting point raised in the programme is that a toxicologist throws doubt on the partridge as the means of delivering the poison (it would have required a greater amount than needed to kill the victim to thoroughly contaminate the bird, and it would have had to be inserted under the skin). He posited that the best means of delivery would have been to dissolve the small amount of poison neccessary in the gravy which she served with it, which he thinks would have given Mrs. Chevis the opportunity - if not the motive - to kill her husband, explain why she would have been secure in accepting the bird to taste (by knowing to take a piece without gravy/ poison), and that it would not have been difficult for her to simulate the symptoms of poisoning, having observed how her husband was affected. 86.156.22.169 ( talk) 19:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hubert Chevis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Hubert Chevis appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 March 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Would this Manchurian partridge be the same bird as the Daurian Partridge? Ericoides ( talk) 07:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The article reference to this programme seems to give undue weight to what is pretty much a gag; it makes it seem that the conclusion is drawn as part of the investigation in the course of the show, when it is delivered as a non-sequitur joke which he immediately undermines by saying that he’s probably reading too much into it. A far more interesting point raised in the programme is that a toxicologist throws doubt on the partridge as the means of delivering the poison (it would have required a greater amount than needed to kill the victim to thoroughly contaminate the bird, and it would have had to be inserted under the skin). He posited that the best means of delivery would have been to dissolve the small amount of poison neccessary in the gravy which she served with it, which he thinks would have given Mrs. Chevis the opportunity - if not the motive - to kill her husband, explain why she would have been secure in accepting the bird to taste (by knowing to take a piece without gravy/ poison), and that it would not have been difficult for her to simulate the symptoms of poisoning, having observed how her husband was affected. 86.156.22.169 ( talk) 19:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hubert Chevis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)