This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The
WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hoonah, Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
An anonymous IP address excised information I added with the edit summary "Undoing this and associated edits by GeoSwan because the photo and story added (fishing boat running aground nearby) were not noteworthy enough to include in a Wikipedia article."
Explaining complicated or controversial edit solely with a brief edit summary is the worst trigger for edit warring.
I reverted this series of edits and encourage the IP contributor to (1) explain themselves on the talk page; (2) establish one named wiki-ID, and use it for all their edits, so their is a single point of contact. I have a terrible wikistalker, who was indefinitely blocked three years ago, and has since then mis-used almost 100 different anonymous IP addresses to continue to wikistalk me. If you really think you can make a positive contribution establish a named wiki-ID.
As for whether this information is "noteworthy enough" - RS thought it was noteworthy enough to write about. Geo Swan ( talk) 14:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The
WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hoonah, Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
An anonymous IP address excised information I added with the edit summary "Undoing this and associated edits by GeoSwan because the photo and story added (fishing boat running aground nearby) were not noteworthy enough to include in a Wikipedia article."
Explaining complicated or controversial edit solely with a brief edit summary is the worst trigger for edit warring.
I reverted this series of edits and encourage the IP contributor to (1) explain themselves on the talk page; (2) establish one named wiki-ID, and use it for all their edits, so their is a single point of contact. I have a terrible wikistalker, who was indefinitely blocked three years ago, and has since then mis-used almost 100 different anonymous IP addresses to continue to wikistalk me. If you really think you can make a positive contribution establish a named wiki-ID.
As for whether this information is "noteworthy enough" - RS thought it was noteworthy enough to write about. Geo Swan ( talk) 14:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)