This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: History / Literature Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Top-importance). This redirect is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Top-importance). This redirect was last assessed in January 2022. Hinduism: Philosophy / Krishnaism High‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as High-importance). This redirect is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance). Religious texts ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles Religion High‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History High‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Poetry High‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology High‑importance This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:  • Mahabharata Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:  • Talk:Mahabharata

In 21st century Indology, no scholar (excludes Hindutva aligned people, by definition) bothers to interrogate the historicity of events in MBh - it has been a long established consensus that from the POV of a historian, the text provides some fragmentary glimpses about polities in iron-age India, at best. I can add a list of sources but don't think it will be necessary. That being said, Witzel and a few others have speculated on links with Battle of the Ten Kings—an article drafted by me—but that's all.

So, why do we need this article? About 90% of the information is irrelevant:-

Lead: The second paragraph of the lead describes the evolution of the text, authorship etc. - this is irrelevant to historicity.

First section: Synopsis of the epic. Irrelevant.

Second section: A copy of Battle of the Ten Kings.

Third section: Yet another irrelevant section about the production of a critical edition.

Fourth section: More irrelevant discussions about layers, evolution of text, manuscripts etc. Hardly a single decent source.

Fifth section: On Kurukshetra War

First sub-section: Not sure what is the end-goal. Irrelevant.

Second sub-section: Decent and relevant; duplicate to Battle of the Ten Kings, at large.

Third sub-section: A bunch of crazies peddling nonsense. I am hearing some of them for the first time.

Fourth sub-section: Hindutva aligned academics.

Sixth section: On Bhagavad Gita

First sub-section: Issues of authorship. Irrelevant.

Second sub-section: Details of variant manuscripts. Irrelevant.

Third sub-section: Dating of the text. Irrelevant.

Fourth sub-section: Whether a historical Krishna existed. Relevant but this belongs at Krishna.

Just redirect this to the main article on MbH. The historicity can be discussed in two/three paragraphs including the thrust of Hindutva arguments and a rebut. TrangaBellam ( talk) 15:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Redirected by me. I don't think this subject needs any further coverage anywhere though. The main article already got enough details about it. Dear Debasish ( talk) 17:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Note: redirection and deletion are controversial, as user:Nadiallah has contested this. If people here want to delete or redirect, please open an AFD discussion on the topic. My opinion is that the topic is notable, as I see there are books and academic writings on this topic. That does not mean that the content here is suitable though. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

While these carts are dated to 1800–1500 BCE (± 150), Gupta and Mani state that "in the present state of archaeological evidence OCP seems to be a stronger contender for the Mahabharata association," dating the Mahabharata War to the 4th millennium BCE.

does this sentence make any sense? OCP doesn’t belong to 4th millennium BCE. Then what is this connection being made to such antiquity? 117.206.0.84 ( talk) 20:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC) reply