Hepatic hydrothorax is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by aeschylus ( talk) at 18:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: I want to try again after fleshing it out over the years. Please email me when accepting so I can awaken from my slumber. |
Hepatic hydrothorax was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 17, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dracophyllum ( talk · contribs) 05:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review, though I know little about the subject matter.
Draco
phyllum 05:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
a) don't need the cite in the lede
b) "The condition does not have any specific symptoms" to "The condition does not have any symptoms specific to it, but main symptoms.." Done
c) The second para of the lede could include less very short sentences by using conjunctions
I'll do more in depth reviewing later, looks good so far Draco phyllum 06:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Only 4 sources seems too few, even for a niche topic, and many sections aren't fleshed out enough. There are many, many more sources to be used: https://www.researchgate.net/search/publication?q=%22Hepatic%20hydrothorax%22, I'll get a fourth opinion, but may fail this sorry. Draco phyllum 23:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Aeschylus: I (and some others) previously suggested that more sources be added, as well as reducing the number of technical language, to improve the comprehensiveness and quality of this article. Neither of these have been achieved and so I will be failing it. Please continue working on this page, its nearly there, and submit it for GA again when you are ready. Using the sources cited in this article: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/hepatic-hydrothorax, may be useful. Draco phyllum 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hepatic hydrothorax is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by aeschylus ( talk) at 18:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Note: I want to try again after fleshing it out over the years. Please email me when accepting so I can awaken from my slumber. |
Hepatic hydrothorax was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 17, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Dracophyllum ( talk · contribs) 05:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review, though I know little about the subject matter.
Draco
phyllum 05:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
a) don't need the cite in the lede
b) "The condition does not have any specific symptoms" to "The condition does not have any symptoms specific to it, but main symptoms.." Done
c) The second para of the lede could include less very short sentences by using conjunctions
I'll do more in depth reviewing later, looks good so far Draco phyllum 06:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Only 4 sources seems too few, even for a niche topic, and many sections aren't fleshed out enough. There are many, many more sources to be used: https://www.researchgate.net/search/publication?q=%22Hepatic%20hydrothorax%22, I'll get a fourth opinion, but may fail this sorry. Draco phyllum 23:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Aeschylus: I (and some others) previously suggested that more sources be added, as well as reducing the number of technical language, to improve the comprehensiveness and quality of this article. Neither of these have been achieved and so I will be failing it. Please continue working on this page, its nearly there, and submit it for GA again when you are ready. Using the sources cited in this article: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/hepatic-hydrothorax, may be useful. Draco phyllum 06:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)