This review is transcluded from Talk:Henry Smith (Royal Navy officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) 21:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Picking up this one. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC) reply

• No need to link Jamaica, China

• Removed.

• Link Commodore

• Done.

• Link admiral on first use

• Done.

• Typo: "showing showing"

• Removed.

• "Smith was given command of another frigate, HMS Druid" Comma after Druid

• Done.

• "While some time was spent at Portsmouth and Gibraltar" Comma after Gibralar

• Done.

• No place of death or burial?

• No place of burial that I can find, but he died in Florence.

• ISBN for Hanes& Sanello (2002)?

• Added.

@ Hawkeye7: Hi, thanks for taking a look! I've responded to your comments. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 22:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Not my area of expertise, but a fascinating article, and a pleasure to read. Kudos for finding the 19th century sources. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: