This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
-- Hiroe ( talk) 05:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The number of frogs one encounters is:
18 is not correct. I've verified this by:
I have corrected this in the article. IIVQ ( talk) 11:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe this frog-counting is kinda meaningless, partly as the number of frogs will vary with the excact layout of the crossing. If for instance the radius of the right-turn curves are increased, that would eliminate two frogs. Also there may be several triple frogs where three rails cross close together, should they count as one or two? Do the designers of such crossings try to maximise the number of triple frogs to reduce the number of individual parts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.145.57 ( talk) 04:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I put a citation needed on the number of tram lines needed to fully utilize a grand junction. It could use some explanation. Benandorsqueaks ( talk) 05:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Grand union. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
-- Hiroe ( talk) 05:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
The number of frogs one encounters is:
18 is not correct. I've verified this by:
I have corrected this in the article. IIVQ ( talk) 11:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe this frog-counting is kinda meaningless, partly as the number of frogs will vary with the excact layout of the crossing. If for instance the radius of the right-turn curves are increased, that would eliminate two frogs. Also there may be several triple frogs where three rails cross close together, should they count as one or two? Do the designers of such crossings try to maximise the number of triple frogs to reduce the number of individual parts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.145.57 ( talk) 04:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I put a citation needed on the number of tram lines needed to fully utilize a grand junction. It could use some explanation. Benandorsqueaks ( talk) 05:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Grand union. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)