This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Grade I and II* listed buildings in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 22:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
– The London WikiProject naming conventions suggest that lists of things in boroughs should be named with the short form of the borough names (per WP:CONCISE), as in the current pages listed above. However, in the case of many boroughs (including Bexley, Lewisham, Greenwich, Ealing, Lambeth and others) this creates substantial ambiguity, as the boroughs have the same name as a locality within the borough. A talk page discussion on the matter indicated a possible consensus for altering this naming convention and the article titles listed above. This follows a recent CfD discussion which came to the same conclusion, and therefore moving these pages would be consistent with the corresponding categories. It should be noted that not all of these article titles create ambiguity (as in Havering, Barking and Dagenham etc.) but they are listed on the basis of consistency. I am open to the current page titles being maintained on that basis, but I feel that this consistency would be preferable. Some of the above articles are at the current title following previous Requested Moves which made the opposite change (see here for example), but the proposer of this requested move indicated in the above talk page discussion that they are in support of this action. I have listed here what I believe are all articles affected by this discussion, again for consistency, but I am open to omitting any exceptions, should they be identified. Jdcooper ( talk) 11:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
|current=
and |new=
parameters from {{
Requested move/dated}}. This means that the parameters now jump from 66 to 71 but I assume that won't be a problem when it comes to making the move. I will now remove
User:RMCD bot/subject notice from the articles, but keep the talk page notices as a record that they were part of the original nomination.
Ham II (
talk) 16:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Grade I and II* listed buildings in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 22:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
– The London WikiProject naming conventions suggest that lists of things in boroughs should be named with the short form of the borough names (per WP:CONCISE), as in the current pages listed above. However, in the case of many boroughs (including Bexley, Lewisham, Greenwich, Ealing, Lambeth and others) this creates substantial ambiguity, as the boroughs have the same name as a locality within the borough. A talk page discussion on the matter indicated a possible consensus for altering this naming convention and the article titles listed above. This follows a recent CfD discussion which came to the same conclusion, and therefore moving these pages would be consistent with the corresponding categories. It should be noted that not all of these article titles create ambiguity (as in Havering, Barking and Dagenham etc.) but they are listed on the basis of consistency. I am open to the current page titles being maintained on that basis, but I feel that this consistency would be preferable. Some of the above articles are at the current title following previous Requested Moves which made the opposite change (see here for example), but the proposer of this requested move indicated in the above talk page discussion that they are in support of this action. I have listed here what I believe are all articles affected by this discussion, again for consistency, but I am open to omitting any exceptions, should they be identified. Jdcooper ( talk) 11:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
|current=
and |new=
parameters from {{
Requested move/dated}}. This means that the parameters now jump from 66 to 71 but I assume that won't be a problem when it comes to making the move. I will now remove
User:RMCD bot/subject notice from the articles, but keep the talk page notices as a record that they were part of the original nomination.
Ham II (
talk) 16:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)