Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gout.
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gout article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Gout has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
There have been recent studies of occupational risk factors for gout. Unanimously all have concluded that carpet cleaning carries by far the highest risk. Editors, please add content related to occupational factors increasing risk of gout. I cannot at the moment, as the article is protected. Thanks, 2601:703:300:820:5C5C:7A94:D011:DB3C ( talk) 23:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
before i restore a whole lot of stuff just deleted, could the culprit pls explain WHY? i was asking abt several CONTRADICTORY sections (fruit coffee dairy etc having positive or negative effects; iron being totally ignored when in fact it pops up heavily in articles abt gout and NSAIDs) which need to be corrected/added to the article.
i DID frame these as "in my experience...", but only to lead in to the subjects. (compare this to threads in the archives where 50 ppl post ad nauseum abt the personal woes they are suffering! yet MY 3 sentences leading up to "why is this info wrong" is considered off-topic?! what the...??)
besides which, this is the TALK page, not the article. would u rather i "be bold" and correct the article w/o discussing it here first?! 2601:19C:527F:7890:8A7:E885:F42D:78BC ( talk) 07:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gout.
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gout article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Gout has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
There have been recent studies of occupational risk factors for gout. Unanimously all have concluded that carpet cleaning carries by far the highest risk. Editors, please add content related to occupational factors increasing risk of gout. I cannot at the moment, as the article is protected. Thanks, 2601:703:300:820:5C5C:7A94:D011:DB3C ( talk) 23:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
before i restore a whole lot of stuff just deleted, could the culprit pls explain WHY? i was asking abt several CONTRADICTORY sections (fruit coffee dairy etc having positive or negative effects; iron being totally ignored when in fact it pops up heavily in articles abt gout and NSAIDs) which need to be corrected/added to the article.
i DID frame these as "in my experience...", but only to lead in to the subjects. (compare this to threads in the archives where 50 ppl post ad nauseum abt the personal woes they are suffering! yet MY 3 sentences leading up to "why is this info wrong" is considered off-topic?! what the...??)
besides which, this is the TALK page, not the article. would u rather i "be bold" and correct the article w/o discussing it here first?! 2601:19C:527F:7890:8A7:E885:F42D:78BC ( talk) 07:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)