This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution B‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles B This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) American Revolutionary War task force United States: Indiana High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as High-importance). National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	George Rogers Clark National Historical Park was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 27, 2009 Good article nominee Listed April 24, 2024 Good article reassessment Delisted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on July 17, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the base of the main memorial (pictured) at George Rogers Clark National Historical Park, designed by Frederic Charles Hirons, has a dirt floor?
Current status: Delisted good article

Article reassessed and graded as stub. -- dashiellx ( talk) 13:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Somehow, the first reference to sculptor Hermon Atkins MacNeil seems to have disappeared. I presume that was a mishap when the image was added, as it would have come just below that. Miss Ivonne ( talk) 13:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply

from the Marietta Mural section. The use of the words "our history" alone are probably enough, but the suggestion that this document ranks, "second only to the Constitution of the United States." really needs to be ( opinion) referenced.

"The Northwest Ordinance July 13, 1787, in which this invention was embodied, also consecrated the region to freedom both of conscience and of labor. It provided the model for all subsequent territories. As a political document, it ranks in our history second only to the Constitution of the United States."

Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 18:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC) reply

This article is an older GA, but is not up to the modern GA criteria. Material about the history of the monument after its construction (for instance, management between construction and NPS management, or details of NPS management) are not included, the purpose and significance section is uncited, and not all material is supported by the existing citations. For instance, I'm not seeing where the count of paving stones in "removal, temporary storage, and numbering of approximately 1,000 large granite paving stones" is found in the source, or the reference to the sprinkler system later in the paragraph. If these issues are not addressed, the article may need to go to good article reassessment. Hog Farm _Talk 15:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Even a quick reading of the lede demonstrates a more casual style than what we should expect in a modern GA. There's no question it's a GA-worthy subject. I see it's been listed for reassessment. BusterD ( talk) 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply