This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Kimberley (Western Australia) was copied or moved into Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
On 19 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia) to Geology of the Kimberley (Western Australia). The result of the discussion was moved. |
1. Add a link to 'protolith' mentioned in Western Zone
2. More explanations on the word 'ensialic' may be needed, or just replace it with simpler terms.
3. It may be better to label the directions of the thrust faults in the post-hooper orogeny and halls creek orogney figures.
Hope this will help. Thanks. 183.179.56.47 ( talk) 06:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
1. The Western, Central and Eastern Zone should be under the Hooper and Lamboo Complexes part instead of having the same title size. It is also suggested that exchange the position of the ‘Zone’ and ‘Age’ columns because there is no ordering found in the ‘Age’ column but in the ‘Zone’ column.
2. For the ‘Orogeny’ column in the summary table, the orogeny event should be more specific, so readers can relate to the event elaborated in the next section ‘Tectonic Evolution. For example, Hooper Orogeny (1865 - 1850 Ma) should be changed into Early to Later Hooper Orogeny (1865 - 1850 Ma).
3. Would be great if some description of each major unit could be added. In the Tectonic Evolution part, in some years without orogeny happened, what has happened during the missing years such as 1845 - 1835 Ma. Is there deposition, erosion or any other things happened?
4. Referencing problem such as missing dates.
5. Grammar problems such as ‘diagram not drawn to scale.
Hope the above recommendations help! :)
Mikocheung ( talk) 10:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I am Victor.
1. For the "economic geology" part, if you don't have time to finish it, just delete it.
2. For the illustration parts, I think you can add some images of the real geology in Kimberley if you can find some in wiki commons so that the audience can have better understanding.
3. For the "Late Hooper Orogeny" diagram, there are some orange intrusions. Can you label them? VictorSo1031 ( talk) 14:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
1. Names in the first figure are small
2. The location of the Lambao complex in the second image is a bit confusing
3. Is it possible to separate these two complex borders by dashed lines?
4. I think the Hooper and Lambao complexes part is a little hard to follow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhmnia11 ( talk • contribs) 11:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Maps, diagrams and cross-sections are big and it is easy to read. Very good. The page is detail.
I think there is few mistakes in the page. 1. For the table inside the section "Eastern Zone", I think the order has some problem. I think you can change the Age "1865-->1870-->1920Ma" Or switch the column "Zone and "Age"
2. I think it is better to add some legend to the cross-sections in the tectonic evolution part. I can see you use color to distingish different units or features. But I think you miss some of them.
Overall the page is real good. I enjoy reading your page. Gabriel HY Lam ( talk) 16:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk) 01:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
No progress on this nomination in over a month and it does not seem that the issues could be addressed.
Moved to mainspace by Timothy D. Chow ( talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett ( talk) at 07:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
The result of the move request was: moved. extremely uncontroversial, no opposition. In the future, similar moves can be made manually or via WP:RMTR. ( closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia) → Geology of the Kimberley (Western Australia) – Grammar correction. Steelkamp ( talk) 09:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Kimberley (Western Australia) was copied or moved into Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
On 19 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia) to Geology of the Kimberley (Western Australia). The result of the discussion was moved. |
1. Add a link to 'protolith' mentioned in Western Zone
2. More explanations on the word 'ensialic' may be needed, or just replace it with simpler terms.
3. It may be better to label the directions of the thrust faults in the post-hooper orogeny and halls creek orogney figures.
Hope this will help. Thanks. 183.179.56.47 ( talk) 06:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
1. The Western, Central and Eastern Zone should be under the Hooper and Lamboo Complexes part instead of having the same title size. It is also suggested that exchange the position of the ‘Zone’ and ‘Age’ columns because there is no ordering found in the ‘Age’ column but in the ‘Zone’ column.
2. For the ‘Orogeny’ column in the summary table, the orogeny event should be more specific, so readers can relate to the event elaborated in the next section ‘Tectonic Evolution. For example, Hooper Orogeny (1865 - 1850 Ma) should be changed into Early to Later Hooper Orogeny (1865 - 1850 Ma).
3. Would be great if some description of each major unit could be added. In the Tectonic Evolution part, in some years without orogeny happened, what has happened during the missing years such as 1845 - 1835 Ma. Is there deposition, erosion or any other things happened?
4. Referencing problem such as missing dates.
5. Grammar problems such as ‘diagram not drawn to scale.
Hope the above recommendations help! :)
Mikocheung ( talk) 10:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I am Victor.
1. For the "economic geology" part, if you don't have time to finish it, just delete it.
2. For the illustration parts, I think you can add some images of the real geology in Kimberley if you can find some in wiki commons so that the audience can have better understanding.
3. For the "Late Hooper Orogeny" diagram, there are some orange intrusions. Can you label them? VictorSo1031 ( talk) 14:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
1. Names in the first figure are small
2. The location of the Lambao complex in the second image is a bit confusing
3. Is it possible to separate these two complex borders by dashed lines?
4. I think the Hooper and Lambao complexes part is a little hard to follow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhmnia11 ( talk • contribs) 11:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Maps, diagrams and cross-sections are big and it is easy to read. Very good. The page is detail.
I think there is few mistakes in the page. 1. For the table inside the section "Eastern Zone", I think the order has some problem. I think you can change the Age "1865-->1870-->1920Ma" Or switch the column "Zone and "Age"
2. I think it is better to add some legend to the cross-sections in the tectonic evolution part. I can see you use color to distingish different units or features. But I think you miss some of them.
Overall the page is real good. I enjoy reading your page. Gabriel HY Lam ( talk) 16:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
Narutolovehinata5 (
talk) 01:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
No progress on this nomination in over a month and it does not seem that the issues could be addressed.
Moved to mainspace by Timothy D. Chow ( talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett ( talk) at 07:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
The result of the move request was: moved. extremely uncontroversial, no opposition. In the future, similar moves can be made manually or via WP:RMTR. ( closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Geology of Kimberley (Western Australia) → Geology of the Kimberley (Western Australia) – Grammar correction. Steelkamp ( talk) 09:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)