Genesis (2005) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Genesis (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Genesis (2005) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Will
C
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. Thanks, Will, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Genesis (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Genesis (2005) has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 27, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Genesis (2005) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Genesis (2005) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 February 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
Will
C
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR) (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. Thanks, Will, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Genesis (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)