This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
In the proof of the Weierstrass definition, is stated without proof. While it is obvious (to me) that this is true when s is a positive integer, I see no way to prove this for non-integers without invoking one of the previous definitions of the gamma function. In particular, I think that this equality needs to be assumed as part of the Weierstrass definition. If I am right, I think we need to say this explicitly. — Quantling ( talk | contribs) 14:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
In the initial description at the start of the page the short description is in the middle of the formula of the gamma function in the mobile version of the site. This does not seem to be the case in the desktop site. Unanimous350 ( talk) 18:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Is there value in using this instead or additionally?:
I suggest adding it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:02, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
are all these defenitions of shown?
The reference for Euler's infinite product says that the limit goes to n!, not 1. 104.187.53.82 ( talk) 16:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
In the proof of the Weierstrass definition, is stated without proof. While it is obvious (to me) that this is true when s is a positive integer, I see no way to prove this for non-integers without invoking one of the previous definitions of the gamma function. In particular, I think that this equality needs to be assumed as part of the Weierstrass definition. If I am right, I think we need to say this explicitly. — Quantling ( talk | contribs) 14:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
In the initial description at the start of the page the short description is in the middle of the formula of the gamma function in the mobile version of the site. This does not seem to be the case in the desktop site. Unanimous350 ( talk) 18:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Is there value in using this instead or additionally?:
I suggest adding it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:02, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
are all these defenitions of shown?
The reference for Euler's infinite product says that the limit goes to n!, not 1. 104.187.53.82 ( talk) 16:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)