From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 23 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved ( non-admin closure) comrade waddie96 ★ ( talk) 11:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC) Fully completed now, apologies had to wait for page mover rights although I did tag the necessary pages with CSD#G6 until such time I got them; however move completed now. comrade waddie96 ★ ( talk) 09:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC) reply



– In relation to the recent discussion at Talk:Rojava#Requested_move_14_October_2019 which concluded that Rojava remain, it makes no sense that other articles about the very same entity use the other proposed name regardless of its official use. In my own research I found articles, templates and categories which use a mixture of Rojava, Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, North and East Syria, NES, Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, Northern Syria and Syrian Kurdish. I personally know of no other territory on Wiki that is so disorganised in the naming of its articles. The reasonings for this vast range of names is clearly due to the various disputes which have been had and the lack of clear up following them. As a result, I call for a unified name under the most recent decision made and for a listing of all Wiki entities related to Rojava be created to ensure such are updated in the future. The articles listed are the ones which I have found so far, but I am sure there are plenty more out there. UaMaol ( talk) 22:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Support move - Rojava should be the name used for all these pages, just as it is on the article about the polity itself and WP:COMMONNAME Sisuvia ( talk) 10:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Rojava is a neutral, well-understood and very commonly used name to reffer to the region and it's administration. Goodposts ( talk) 12:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Support per consensus; the results of all three requested moves on Talk:Rojava this year showed that there is no consensus to refer to the polity as the NES or AANES, and that Rojava remains the common name at this time.  Vanilla   Wizard  💙 21:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 23 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved ( non-admin closure) comrade waddie96 ★ ( talk) 11:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC) Fully completed now, apologies had to wait for page mover rights although I did tag the necessary pages with CSD#G6 until such time I got them; however move completed now. comrade waddie96 ★ ( talk) 09:24, 1 November 2019 (UTC) reply



– In relation to the recent discussion at Talk:Rojava#Requested_move_14_October_2019 which concluded that Rojava remain, it makes no sense that other articles about the very same entity use the other proposed name regardless of its official use. In my own research I found articles, templates and categories which use a mixture of Rojava, Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, North and East Syria, NES, Democratic Federation of Northern Syria, Northern Syria and Syrian Kurdish. I personally know of no other territory on Wiki that is so disorganised in the naming of its articles. The reasonings for this vast range of names is clearly due to the various disputes which have been had and the lack of clear up following them. As a result, I call for a unified name under the most recent decision made and for a listing of all Wiki entities related to Rojava be created to ensure such are updated in the future. The articles listed are the ones which I have found so far, but I am sure there are plenty more out there. UaMaol ( talk) 22:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Support move - Rojava should be the name used for all these pages, just as it is on the article about the polity itself and WP:COMMONNAME Sisuvia ( talk) 10:04, 24 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Support per WP:COMMONNAME. Rojava is a neutral, well-understood and very commonly used name to reffer to the region and it's administration. Goodposts ( talk) 12:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Support per consensus; the results of all three requested moves on Talk:Rojava this year showed that there is no consensus to refer to the polity as the NES or AANES, and that Rojava remains the common name at this time.  Vanilla   Wizard  💙 21:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook