From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fools revolt)

Article title

There's probably some more specific WP:MOS consideration about this, but anyway.

Hope this helps. 09:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 12 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 06:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply


Fools revoltFools' Revolt – Grammatically correct name in english Ivannilych ( talk) 17:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  Polyamorph ( talk) 18:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Note: WikiProject History has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support, but if it is not a proper noun, perhaps Fools' revolt would be better? If it is a proper noun, then move per nom. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Relisting comment: confirmation needed on whether this is a proper noun Polyamorph ( talk) 18:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nominator. "Fools revolt" would be grammatical only if it formed a sentence such as "the fools revolt now", which this article is not about. JIP | Talk 19:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fools revolt)

Article title

There's probably some more specific WP:MOS consideration about this, but anyway.

Hope this helps. 09:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 12 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal ( talk) 06:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply


Fools revoltFools' Revolt – Grammatically correct name in english Ivannilych ( talk) 17:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  Polyamorph ( talk) 18:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Note: WikiProject History has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support, but if it is not a proper noun, perhaps Fools' revolt would be better? If it is a proper noun, then move per nom. Bensci54 ( talk) 17:41, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply
Relisting comment: confirmation needed on whether this is a proper noun Polyamorph ( talk) 18:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nominator. "Fools revolt" would be grammatical only if it formed a sentence such as "the fools revolt now", which this article is not about. JIP | Talk 19:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook