This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Flying Spaghetti Monster article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Flying Spaghetti Monster. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Flying Spaghetti Monster at the Reference desk. |
Flying Spaghetti Monster has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
Frequently asked questions To view the response to a question, click the [show] link to the right of the question. Flying Spaghetti Monster FAQ Q1: Why is this described as a parody religion? Who determines whether or not a religion is a parody?
A1: Reliable sources. There is unanimity among reliable, third-party sources that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a satire. Moreover, founder Bobby Henderson is implied to have said it was in an interview with
USA Today. "I don't know if (the FSM parody) makes a difference," Henderson says. "People who really need to get it aren't probably listening. But if anything, it might bring some awareness to undecided people out there."
[1] In any case, Wikipedia's standard for inclusion is
verifiability, not truth. The bottom line is that we report what reliable sources have said. Q2: This offends me, a true Pastafarian, or could offend others. Should Wikipedia really be deliberately offending others?
A2: Putting aside whether a "true Pastafarian" exists, Wikipedia is
not censored for one group or another, even if that means offending some people. Q3: Why does such an "insignificant" topic deserve such a long article?
A3: Simply put, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is
notable. It has been mentioned in detail by news sources throughout the world. In the US, the
New York Times,
USA Today,
Washington Post and many others wrote about it. In the UK,
The Guardian,
The Daily Telegraph,
BBC and others wrote about it. In Germany,
Der Spiegel wrote about it. In Canada, the
Toronto Star wrote about it. In Australia, the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation wrote about it. Even the
Council of Europe mentioned the Flying Spaghetti Monster in a report about Creationism in science standards, and this is not to mention its ubiquity among online technology sites and notable blogs. Like it or not, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is famous. A comprehensive presentation requires a certain length. |
This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Why keep deleting the various church links? FSMdeaf0ne ( talk) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article contains many instances of incorrect punctuation, particularly at the end of a sentence; namely a period following a quote sign, rather than a period followed by a quote sign. Example (first paragraph of the article: incorrect (as currently appears) -- "... as any other"; corrected version -- "... as any other." 75.161.225.119 ( talk) 16:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The church of the FSM creates a new god as a part of its religion every year. These are recorded on the relevant Facebook page. Is there any way a list of these new gods could be included in the wiki page for the FSM itself. 2A02:C7C:B412:800:2D83:E4C7:6D26:E3FA ( talk) 16:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Flying Spaghetti Monster article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Flying Spaghetti Monster. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Flying Spaghetti Monster at the Reference desk. |
Flying Spaghetti Monster has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
Frequently asked questions To view the response to a question, click the [show] link to the right of the question. Flying Spaghetti Monster FAQ Q1: Why is this described as a parody religion? Who determines whether or not a religion is a parody?
A1: Reliable sources. There is unanimity among reliable, third-party sources that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is a satire. Moreover, founder Bobby Henderson is implied to have said it was in an interview with
USA Today. "I don't know if (the FSM parody) makes a difference," Henderson says. "People who really need to get it aren't probably listening. But if anything, it might bring some awareness to undecided people out there."
[1] In any case, Wikipedia's standard for inclusion is
verifiability, not truth. The bottom line is that we report what reliable sources have said. Q2: This offends me, a true Pastafarian, or could offend others. Should Wikipedia really be deliberately offending others?
A2: Putting aside whether a "true Pastafarian" exists, Wikipedia is
not censored for one group or another, even if that means offending some people. Q3: Why does such an "insignificant" topic deserve such a long article?
A3: Simply put, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is
notable. It has been mentioned in detail by news sources throughout the world. In the US, the
New York Times,
USA Today,
Washington Post and many others wrote about it. In the UK,
The Guardian,
The Daily Telegraph,
BBC and others wrote about it. In Germany,
Der Spiegel wrote about it. In Canada, the
Toronto Star wrote about it. In Australia, the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation wrote about it. Even the
Council of Europe mentioned the Flying Spaghetti Monster in a report about Creationism in science standards, and this is not to mention its ubiquity among online technology sites and notable blogs. Like it or not, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is famous. A comprehensive presentation requires a certain length. |
This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Why keep deleting the various church links? FSMdeaf0ne ( talk) 12:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article contains many instances of incorrect punctuation, particularly at the end of a sentence; namely a period following a quote sign, rather than a period followed by a quote sign. Example (first paragraph of the article: incorrect (as currently appears) -- "... as any other"; corrected version -- "... as any other." 75.161.225.119 ( talk) 16:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The church of the FSM creates a new god as a part of its religion every year. These are recorded on the relevant Facebook page. Is there any way a list of these new gods could be included in the wiki page for the FSM itself. 2A02:C7C:B412:800:2D83:E4C7:6D26:E3FA ( talk) 16:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)