From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Almost there. 7-day hold to Krisgabwoosh. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 07:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

  • Should "Minister of Mining and Metallurgy" be capitalized in the first sentence?
  • I tend to follow the style of not capitalizing titles if it comes after a person’s name (i.e. Joe Biden served as vice president of the United States). Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 07:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Ah, OK. That makes sense.
  • Don't italicize "Radio Fides Potosí" (radio station names don't get italics)
  • The minister of mining must publicly apologize". Full sentence — period in quote. MOS:INOROUT
  • ...remove the authority; one she complied with. "Remove the authority" sounds un-idiomatic; that should not be a semicolon; the trailing "with" is kind of meh here
  • Changed to: "remove the minister. The president complied, and on 30 May, "
  • Write "22" as a number
  •  Done. Out of curiosity, what is Wikipedia's general style for when to and not to write out numbers vs. using numerals? Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 07:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Ah, turns out both are acceptable: MOS:NUMERAL. Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred).

Other items

  • Sources check out, and all references are archived.
  • Earwig turns up no issues.
  • Images need alt text.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 06:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c ( OR):
    d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Almost there. 7-day hold to Krisgabwoosh. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 07:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

  • Should "Minister of Mining and Metallurgy" be capitalized in the first sentence?
  • I tend to follow the style of not capitalizing titles if it comes after a person’s name (i.e. Joe Biden served as vice president of the United States). Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 07:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Ah, OK. That makes sense.
  • Don't italicize "Radio Fides Potosí" (radio station names don't get italics)
  • The minister of mining must publicly apologize". Full sentence — period in quote. MOS:INOROUT
  • ...remove the authority; one she complied with. "Remove the authority" sounds un-idiomatic; that should not be a semicolon; the trailing "with" is kind of meh here
  • Changed to: "remove the minister. The president complied, and on 30 May, "
  • Write "22" as a number
  •  Done. Out of curiosity, what is Wikipedia's general style for when to and not to write out numbers vs. using numerals? Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 07:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Ah, turns out both are acceptable: MOS:NUMERAL. Integers greater than nine expressible in one or two words may be expressed either in numerals or in words (16 or sixteen, 84 or eighty-four, 200 or two hundred).

Other items

  • Sources check out, and all references are archived.
  • Earwig turns up no issues.
  • Images need alt text.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook