Federalist No. 4 has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Will review.
ツ LunaEatsTuna (
💬)— 00:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
The portrait of John Jay is of good quality, copyright-free and relevant to the article.
Passes spotcheck: refs 1–3 and 8 are good.
Federalist No. 4 has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 9, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Will review.
ツ LunaEatsTuna (
💬)— 00:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
The portrait of John Jay is of good quality, copyright-free and relevant to the article.
Passes spotcheck: refs 1–3 and 8 are good.