Federalist No. 25 has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 11, 2024. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history. United States History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{ WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{ WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}} Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:Federalist No. 25/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC) reply

• "He concludes…be ignored" You should also mention his argument that breaches of Constitutional restrictions on the raising/keeping of an army, which he sees as inevitable when required, will also lower the respect for the Constitution and lower the gravity of the situation if the Constitution is ever violated without cause.
• "would require control over both the legislature and the executive" The more pertinent argument he makes is that if such a collusion were to exist, the legislature and executive could also easily evade constitutional restrictions by fabricating pretenses to say that the nation is not in a state of peace.
• You also entirely ignore his argument that restrictions on purely raising an army in peacetime are impossible to enforce, because the only one who could enforce them (the Federal government) could also ignore them as it pleases.
• "examples of states" Sparta is also an example cited.
• "when it was a point of contention" to "being a point of contention"
• "in Federalist No. 40, No. 41, and No. 48." should be "in Federalists No. 40, No. 41, and No. 48."
• Sources seem reliable and are properly formatted; will perform spot-checks later.
  • Spot-checks: Sources checked verified claims made.
  • "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress.
  • Levinson, Sanford (November 24, 2015). An Argument Open to All: Reading "The Federalist" in the 21st Century. Yale University Press.
  • Scott, Kyle (2013). The Federalist Papers: A Reader's Guide. A&C Black.
  • Edling, Max M. (2020). "'A Vigorous National Government': Hamilton on Security, War, and Revenue". In Rakove, Jack N.; Sheehan, Colleen A. (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to the Federalist Papers. Cambridge University Press.
• Nice work overall. AryKun ( talk) 08:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  AryKun, I made all suggested changes, although they might need another look to make sure the wording is clear and that I covered everything. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 23:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  Made a small tweak and everything else is great, so will be passing. AryKun ( talk) 12:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed