This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fastest animals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added a couple that should be on the list, the domestic cat and great white shark, both are definitely faster than the humble human it's proven so it's insulting neither made this list, aside from our species being the most well documented (naturally for us) even Bolt's record speed is nothing special to be on this list, there are countless faster animals on foot. I would try to edit the page again but it's pointless if it will only be reversed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:1D98:6800:FD3D:11B4:932C:6281 ( talk) 07:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Concerning the vertebrate animals mammals, (the zone that I take care) i put that certain speeds and realities, by knowledge also and I found that it was very also to explain to esteem. For giraffes have find few reliable references or then sites which money respect while they are animals very fast, (I have already seen the races of giraffes and they go so fast as from lions or zebras to sprint) but no references mentions that it goes to 50 mph (80 km/h)! We know just that she can reach 35 mph (but it is its average in the sprint in reality, because point real she makes 50 mph (80 km/h). In knowledge that many references mix the top speed and the average speed, due to the lack of knowledge, and speeds it is not as well simple as in the sight, moreover his gives errors sometimes.-- Angel310 ( talk) 17:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
My changes were limited to changing every species to a good link, and to adding information about the (claimed) fastest insect.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 01:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
The article states that the fastest animal in body lengths per second is Paratarsotomus macropalpis at 322 body lengths per second, but then it says that Anna's Hummingbird achieves 385 body lengths per second. Isn't 385 more than 322? Ashorocetus ( talk) 18:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Colour me sceptical, but I highly doubt the veracity of the cited claim. An insect travelling at 90 MPH would surely be noteworthy.
Sophomoric ( talk) 12:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I can't tell if speedofanimals.com is a circular reference or just a bad one, but it's a good example of some missing common sense or something.
I bet someone can find a source for a horse fly speed ... i can't ... but some other web sites have less insane estimates at 20-25 mph ... Sad to say I would not dare try to edit wikipedia, good luck whoever cares about this liberal biased 911 conspiracy denying crap heap and have fun! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.115.98 ( talk) 03:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
There have been several attempts to add the speed reached by freefalling skydiver Felix Baumgartner. Yes, some birds use gravity to achieve their maximum speed, but at least they actually gain their potential energy themselves in flight. We don't include the terminal velocity of other animals (elephants or turtles, for example) that are tossed out of airplanes or fall off of cliffs. Why do it for people? Anyone want to support including the skydiving speed? Meters ( talk) 04:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
After reading through this list, it seems that there is a lot of information that needs to be double-checked and fixed. For example, the reference for the speed of the housefly lists Wikipedia as the source for the information on that site. The site that the speed of the Bearded Dragon comes from makes no reference to speed anywhere. And there's more. I'd be willing to help clean this all up so that all the properly reference facts remain, but I wanted to see if anyone had anything they wanted to contribute first. Should this list be "culled"/clean up like this? Drathe ( talk) 08:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Apparently horse fly's have been estimated at that speed by an official study so stfu with your lols and rush limbaugh ranting buddy.
Kutsch, W., and Fuchs, U., 2000, Locust flight initiation: a comparison of normal and artificial release: Physiological entomology, 25, 370-382. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.115.98 ( talk) 03:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This piece of information is surely wrong: Instantaneous max. 65.26 km/h (40.55 mph) Avg max over fastest 10-20m - 60kmh/40mph[77] Compared to other land animals, humans are exceptionally capable of endurance, but exceptionally incapable of great speed. based on this information, human being can pass 100 meter in 6 seconds, while surely he cannot! Also, this passage says humans are capable in endurance. It is obviously wrong as well. Esmatly ( talk) 13:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't trust the website where they are pulling that top speed from. Most websites do 43 mph or 45 mph, not 60 mph as it suggests here. Maybe they got kph confused?
At any rate, a more reliable source seems to be needed to confirm that an ostrich can run that fast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okami31 ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This indeed appears to be wrong. I have found several scientific papers that list the top speed of ostriches as 70 km/h, and a sustained speed of >50 km/h. The best guess is that the currently cited article confused top speed with sustained speed and mph with km/h.
See e.g.
I removed it. The website doesn't exist anymore. Ostrich top speed is 70-72km/h as per Nat Geo Wild and Animal Planet. The claim also matches that of the main Wikipedia article page of Ostrich. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that the common dolphin is a land mammal, so maybe either the title should be changed to just mammal, or the dolphin should be removed (or a picture added of a dolphin moving 65km/h on land). 00:04, 24. August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.82.28.221 ( talk)
New research [2] has shown, that many reported top speeds for several kind of fish are infeasible. Bnord ( talk) 09:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
References
Also the sources given for them are woefully poor. I've removed them and added citation requests, but maybe we should just remove the claims entirely, and add a note referencing this paper. Danny Yee ( talk) 11:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I suggest to merge both lists fastest and slowest animals, and construct a list of animals by speed.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fastest animals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
I just read an article that the serval is among the fastest animals at 75-80 km/h but it's not on the list. Then I started looking for other top-lists and found a couple other animals which are missing from here. Eg. http://dinoanimals.com/animals/the-fastest-animals-in-the-world-top-100/
Fejesjoco ( talk) 19:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes, Smithsonian channel has also claimed that Servals are second fastest cat after cheeath with 50 mph top speed. There are also other claims of caracals having 80km/h top speed. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, could deer (i.e. red deer) be added to this list? According to this [1] article different types of deers can reach up to 60-65 km/h. Sauer202 ( talk) 16:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
References
Should the speed of Guerrouj and Masterkova be in the article as it is now under the mammal section? 92.19.189.218 ( talk) 19:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The note says that ostriches and swordfish have around the same speed, but fails to actually add the ostrich into the fastest animals — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.1.201 ( talk) 04:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that the page has some inconsistency with the format in which it lists the speed measurements. Fluctuates between liting km/h first and mph first. 50.100.49.243 ( talk) 21:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm trying to find the relative speed of animals, but after trying my hand at the cheetah, I'm left conflicted about how to do it. The cheetah is said to be 16 body lengths, but I came to the conclusion of a range of about 20-30 body lengths, and I want to know where this discrepancy comes from. I divided the number of meters per second by their length to get my answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThunderBrine ( talk contribs) 02:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I’m yet to see any actual sources showing that bearded dragons can run at 25 mph as the source provided doesn’t seem to show anything substantial on it and contradicts itself by saying they can run at 9 mph. Anybody feel like linking something that shows evidence of them running at 25 mph? Alistair Naj ( talk) 06:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
(See false precision.)
The headline claims that the Cheetah has a top speed of "120.7 km/h (75.0 mph)".
That would imply that the Cheetah's speed was measured to an accuracy of ±0.05 km/h (±0.03 mph) which is extremely unlikely to be true, and certainly is not backed up by any cited sources. Moreover, some of the citations say that speeds over 70 mph have been discredited, so using that in the headline is doubly dubious.
This pattern continues throughout the article: numbers that are integer multiples of 5 appear far more often than would occur by chance, which strongly suggests that most of them are approximations, accurate to (at best) ±2½, and more likely ±5. Yet most of them give imperial/metric conversions that imply accuracy of ±0.5, and even worse, some include ".0", implying that they are accurate to ±0.05.
The abuses are clearer where ranges are given:
Tigers have been documented going slower than 30 mph, so clearly the given range is supposed to indicate an upper bound with an indication of its uncertainty: ±5 mph at best. Therefore showing anything other than "0" or "5" as the last digit is unjustified, and I suggest that it should be shown as "30 to 40 mph (50 to 65 km/h)", or even better, just "up to 40 mph (65 km/h)".
At least 16 other claims in this article are demonstrably false because of their egregiously spurious precision, and another dozen or so have are whole multiples of 5 that should not be taken as implying ±0.5 precision.
Many of these errors were introduced by a single edit back in 2013, which nobody has seen fit to revert or repair.
This is so bad that I don't have the energy to try to fix it.
TL;DR: please don't edit any numbers here without first reading false precision.
Martin Kealey ( talk) 00:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Siberian tigers is claimed to have top speeds up to 80 km/h on short bursts that helps them run down prey on top of snow. This appears in google search, also I've watched this claim in an episode of an old Nat Geo tv show called- Build For Speed. I read about this claim in a couple of hunting journals about Siberian tigers. Hard to find a reliable link to use here tho. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fastest animals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added a couple that should be on the list, the domestic cat and great white shark, both are definitely faster than the humble human it's proven so it's insulting neither made this list, aside from our species being the most well documented (naturally for us) even Bolt's record speed is nothing special to be on this list, there are countless faster animals on foot. I would try to edit the page again but it's pointless if it will only be reversed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:1D98:6800:FD3D:11B4:932C:6281 ( talk) 07:07, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Concerning the vertebrate animals mammals, (the zone that I take care) i put that certain speeds and realities, by knowledge also and I found that it was very also to explain to esteem. For giraffes have find few reliable references or then sites which money respect while they are animals very fast, (I have already seen the races of giraffes and they go so fast as from lions or zebras to sprint) but no references mentions that it goes to 50 mph (80 km/h)! We know just that she can reach 35 mph (but it is its average in the sprint in reality, because point real she makes 50 mph (80 km/h). In knowledge that many references mix the top speed and the average speed, due to the lack of knowledge, and speeds it is not as well simple as in the sight, moreover his gives errors sometimes.-- Angel310 ( talk) 17:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
My changes were limited to changing every species to a good link, and to adding information about the (claimed) fastest insect.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 01:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
The article states that the fastest animal in body lengths per second is Paratarsotomus macropalpis at 322 body lengths per second, but then it says that Anna's Hummingbird achieves 385 body lengths per second. Isn't 385 more than 322? Ashorocetus ( talk) 18:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Colour me sceptical, but I highly doubt the veracity of the cited claim. An insect travelling at 90 MPH would surely be noteworthy.
Sophomoric ( talk) 12:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I can't tell if speedofanimals.com is a circular reference or just a bad one, but it's a good example of some missing common sense or something.
I bet someone can find a source for a horse fly speed ... i can't ... but some other web sites have less insane estimates at 20-25 mph ... Sad to say I would not dare try to edit wikipedia, good luck whoever cares about this liberal biased 911 conspiracy denying crap heap and have fun! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.115.98 ( talk) 03:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
There have been several attempts to add the speed reached by freefalling skydiver Felix Baumgartner. Yes, some birds use gravity to achieve their maximum speed, but at least they actually gain their potential energy themselves in flight. We don't include the terminal velocity of other animals (elephants or turtles, for example) that are tossed out of airplanes or fall off of cliffs. Why do it for people? Anyone want to support including the skydiving speed? Meters ( talk) 04:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
After reading through this list, it seems that there is a lot of information that needs to be double-checked and fixed. For example, the reference for the speed of the housefly lists Wikipedia as the source for the information on that site. The site that the speed of the Bearded Dragon comes from makes no reference to speed anywhere. And there's more. I'd be willing to help clean this all up so that all the properly reference facts remain, but I wanted to see if anyone had anything they wanted to contribute first. Should this list be "culled"/clean up like this? Drathe ( talk) 08:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Apparently horse fly's have been estimated at that speed by an official study so stfu with your lols and rush limbaugh ranting buddy.
Kutsch, W., and Fuchs, U., 2000, Locust flight initiation: a comparison of normal and artificial release: Physiological entomology, 25, 370-382. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.115.98 ( talk) 03:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This piece of information is surely wrong: Instantaneous max. 65.26 km/h (40.55 mph) Avg max over fastest 10-20m - 60kmh/40mph[77] Compared to other land animals, humans are exceptionally capable of endurance, but exceptionally incapable of great speed. based on this information, human being can pass 100 meter in 6 seconds, while surely he cannot! Also, this passage says humans are capable in endurance. It is obviously wrong as well. Esmatly ( talk) 13:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't trust the website where they are pulling that top speed from. Most websites do 43 mph or 45 mph, not 60 mph as it suggests here. Maybe they got kph confused?
At any rate, a more reliable source seems to be needed to confirm that an ostrich can run that fast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okami31 ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This indeed appears to be wrong. I have found several scientific papers that list the top speed of ostriches as 70 km/h, and a sustained speed of >50 km/h. The best guess is that the currently cited article confused top speed with sustained speed and mph with km/h.
See e.g.
I removed it. The website doesn't exist anymore. Ostrich top speed is 70-72km/h as per Nat Geo Wild and Animal Planet. The claim also matches that of the main Wikipedia article page of Ostrich. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that the common dolphin is a land mammal, so maybe either the title should be changed to just mammal, or the dolphin should be removed (or a picture added of a dolphin moving 65km/h on land). 00:04, 24. August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.82.28.221 ( talk)
New research [2] has shown, that many reported top speeds for several kind of fish are infeasible. Bnord ( talk) 09:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
References
Also the sources given for them are woefully poor. I've removed them and added citation requests, but maybe we should just remove the claims entirely, and add a note referencing this paper. Danny Yee ( talk) 11:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I suggest to merge both lists fastest and slowest animals, and construct a list of animals by speed.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fastest animals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
I just read an article that the serval is among the fastest animals at 75-80 km/h but it's not on the list. Then I started looking for other top-lists and found a couple other animals which are missing from here. Eg. http://dinoanimals.com/animals/the-fastest-animals-in-the-world-top-100/
Fejesjoco ( talk) 19:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes, Smithsonian channel has also claimed that Servals are second fastest cat after cheeath with 50 mph top speed. There are also other claims of caracals having 80km/h top speed. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, could deer (i.e. red deer) be added to this list? According to this [1] article different types of deers can reach up to 60-65 km/h. Sauer202 ( talk) 16:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
References
Should the speed of Guerrouj and Masterkova be in the article as it is now under the mammal section? 92.19.189.218 ( talk) 19:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
The note says that ostriches and swordfish have around the same speed, but fails to actually add the ostrich into the fastest animals — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.1.201 ( talk) 04:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that the page has some inconsistency with the format in which it lists the speed measurements. Fluctuates between liting km/h first and mph first. 50.100.49.243 ( talk) 21:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm trying to find the relative speed of animals, but after trying my hand at the cheetah, I'm left conflicted about how to do it. The cheetah is said to be 16 body lengths, but I came to the conclusion of a range of about 20-30 body lengths, and I want to know where this discrepancy comes from. I divided the number of meters per second by their length to get my answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThunderBrine ( talk contribs) 02:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I’m yet to see any actual sources showing that bearded dragons can run at 25 mph as the source provided doesn’t seem to show anything substantial on it and contradicts itself by saying they can run at 9 mph. Anybody feel like linking something that shows evidence of them running at 25 mph? Alistair Naj ( talk) 06:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
(See false precision.)
The headline claims that the Cheetah has a top speed of "120.7 km/h (75.0 mph)".
That would imply that the Cheetah's speed was measured to an accuracy of ±0.05 km/h (±0.03 mph) which is extremely unlikely to be true, and certainly is not backed up by any cited sources. Moreover, some of the citations say that speeds over 70 mph have been discredited, so using that in the headline is doubly dubious.
This pattern continues throughout the article: numbers that are integer multiples of 5 appear far more often than would occur by chance, which strongly suggests that most of them are approximations, accurate to (at best) ±2½, and more likely ±5. Yet most of them give imperial/metric conversions that imply accuracy of ±0.5, and even worse, some include ".0", implying that they are accurate to ±0.05.
The abuses are clearer where ranges are given:
Tigers have been documented going slower than 30 mph, so clearly the given range is supposed to indicate an upper bound with an indication of its uncertainty: ±5 mph at best. Therefore showing anything other than "0" or "5" as the last digit is unjustified, and I suggest that it should be shown as "30 to 40 mph (50 to 65 km/h)", or even better, just "up to 40 mph (65 km/h)".
At least 16 other claims in this article are demonstrably false because of their egregiously spurious precision, and another dozen or so have are whole multiples of 5 that should not be taken as implying ±0.5 precision.
Many of these errors were introduced by a single edit back in 2013, which nobody has seen fit to revert or repair.
This is so bad that I don't have the energy to try to fix it.
TL;DR: please don't edit any numbers here without first reading false precision.
Martin Kealey ( talk) 00:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Siberian tigers is claimed to have top speeds up to 80 km/h on short bursts that helps them run down prey on top of snow. This appears in google search, also I've watched this claim in an episode of an old Nat Geo tv show called- Build For Speed. I read about this claim in a couple of hunting journals about Siberian tigers. Hard to find a reliable link to use here tho. Ishan87 ( talk) 14:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)