Family in early modern Scotland has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 26, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
SabreBD (
talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. Thanks, SabreBD, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Family in early modern Scotland has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 26, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
Seabuckthorn (
talk ·
contribs) 00:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator:
SabreBD (
talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b.
Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No
edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. Thanks, SabreBD, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. -- Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)