This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This book currently failsto satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, at least based on the eleven current footnotes, which don't appear to establish notability. NBOOK #1 is 50% satisfied, based on note 7, referring to Morelli's book, which is a full-length treatment of Ponsnoby's book and ideas. Wrt the other footnotes, my reading of their applicability to notability is as follows:
Grouping them by applicability, we have:
It's possible additional sources could be found to fulfill BOOKCRIT #1; try some of these:
but if not, this article should be submitted to Afd. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 23:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This book currently failsto satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, at least based on the eleven current footnotes, which don't appear to establish notability. NBOOK #1 is 50% satisfied, based on note 7, referring to Morelli's book, which is a full-length treatment of Ponsnoby's book and ideas. Wrt the other footnotes, my reading of their applicability to notability is as follows:
Grouping them by applicability, we have:
It's possible additional sources could be found to fulfill BOOKCRIT #1; try some of these:
but if not, this article should be submitted to Afd. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 23:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)