 | Faith and Confidence has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 2, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | A fact from Faith and Confidence appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 31 January 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
.svg){kind=small} |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 19:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
(1957) a policeman patiently reasons with a two-year-old boy
- ... that the 1958 Pulitzer Prize jury said
a photograph (pictured) by
William C. Beall "made a profound impression on readers ... freezing forever a moment of childhood innocence"? Source:
For his photograph "Faith and Confidence," showing a policeman patiently reasoning with two-year-old boy trying to cross a street during a parade. and
made a profound impression on readers... freezing forever a moment of childhood innocence"
- ALT1: ... that even though Faith and Confidence (pictured) by William C. Beall won the 1958 Pulitzer Prize for photography, the jurors who selected it were unimpressed by all of the entries? Source: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Picture_Coverage_of_the_World/Dw0Gx8XsWdUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Faith+and+Confidence+photo&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover unimpressed by the entries and said no single picture impressed us as being outstanding.]
- ALT2: ... that William C. Beall captured a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph (pictured) at a 1957 parade in Chinatown, Washington, D.C.? Source: Bill was more fortunate 12 years later. By then, he was a staff photographer for the Washington Daily News, lugging his bulky Speed Graphic camera around the streets of the District. One day in September 1957, he was in Chinatown for a parade.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yule cat
- Comment: Second QPQ for double hook Template:Did you know nominations/Nikolauskirche (Oberndorf) I will also continue to polish the articles.
Created by Bruxton ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Faith and Confidence; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Both articles are new enough and long enough. Sources are excellent. Neutral. No copyvio issues (Earwig gives a score of 30% for Faith and Confidence, and 16.7% for Beall, but it's due to quotes and proper nouns). Hooks are cited and interesting, and I like the main hook. I think the image is in the public domain. Both QPQs are done. Good job!
Cheers, --
The Lonely Pather (
talk) 21:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Faith and Confidence/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lightburst ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I will review this
Not a very long article but an interesting subject
- "The description of the image on the Pulitzer Prizes website" - should make prize singular
I have done this.
- Citations - I have checked the citations and they are correct. Lightburst ( talk) 02:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- The images are good and they appear to be free and licensed
Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Some incorrect punctuation involved with quotes. MOS:LQUOTE I will fix these.
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- GA-Class Photography articles
- Unknown-importance Photography articles
- GA-Class History of photography articles
- WikiProject Photography articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
|
| Faith and Confidence has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 2, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| A fact from Faith and Confidence appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 31 January 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
|
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 19:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
(1957) a policeman patiently reasons with a two-year-old boy
- ... that the 1958 Pulitzer Prize jury said
a photograph (pictured) by
William C. Beall "made a profound impression on readers ... freezing forever a moment of childhood innocence"? Source:
For his photograph "Faith and Confidence," showing a policeman patiently reasoning with two-year-old boy trying to cross a street during a parade. and
made a profound impression on readers... freezing forever a moment of childhood innocence"
- ALT1: ... that even though Faith and Confidence (pictured) by William C. Beall won the 1958 Pulitzer Prize for photography, the jurors who selected it were unimpressed by all of the entries? Source: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Picture_Coverage_of_the_World/Dw0Gx8XsWdUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Faith+and+Confidence+photo&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover unimpressed by the entries and said no single picture impressed us as being outstanding.]
- ALT2: ... that William C. Beall captured a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph (pictured) at a 1957 parade in Chinatown, Washington, D.C.? Source: Bill was more fortunate 12 years later. By then, he was a staff photographer for the Washington Daily News, lugging his bulky Speed Graphic camera around the streets of the District. One day in September 1957, he was in Chinatown for a parade.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yule cat
- Comment: Second QPQ for double hook Template:Did you know nominations/Nikolauskirche (Oberndorf) I will also continue to polish the articles.
Created by Bruxton ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Faith and Confidence; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Both articles are new enough and long enough. Sources are excellent. Neutral. No copyvio issues (Earwig gives a score of 30% for Faith and Confidence, and 16.7% for Beall, but it's due to quotes and proper nouns). Hooks are cited and interesting, and I like the main hook. I think the image is in the public domain. Both QPQs are done. Good job!
Cheers, --
The Lonely Pather (
talk) 21:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Faith and Confidence/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lightburst ( talk · contribs) 02:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
I will review this
Not a very long article but an interesting subject
- "The description of the image on the Pulitzer Prizes website" - should make prize singular
- I have done this.
- Citations - I have checked the citations and they are correct. Lightburst ( talk) 02:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- The images are good and they appear to be free and licensed
Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Some incorrect punctuation involved with quotes. MOS:LQUOTE I will fix these.
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- GA-Class Photography articles
- Unknown-importance Photography articles
- GA-Class History of photography articles
- WikiProject Photography articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles