This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fading (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Fading (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
1111tomica (
talk ·
contribs) 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Another reviewer is need because the current one is also a part Wikiproject Rihanna and could be bias.
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · count) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No. Has had an AFD within the past two weeks. This led to major expansion which shows has not been stable during its nomination | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
The writers are in correct for this song. Ester Dean did not write this song. Quintin Amey p.k.a King Epiq wrote the lyrics of this song. [1] Check info on Itunes for the song and it will tell you that. The song had the wrong credits for the first shipments of the album and then they went on to correct that afterwards. Some websites even have the correct writers listed besides wikipedia if you search google. Rodgerdat ( talk) 05:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Is there any possible way that we can break up these two sections? To flesh out the article more? Would anyone be opposed to me attempting to do that?-- mikomango mwa! 13:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs) 04:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll do this in several steps. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Looks good | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Looks good | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Good | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Good | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Good | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Good | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Stable per criteria | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
An image used in this article,
File:Ester Dean.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
Here Aaron • You Da One 13:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
What is the source for the length being 3:20? iTunes lists it as 3:27. -- 189.30.247.20 ( talk) 17:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Since this song is not a single or even a promotional single, I find it questionable to give this its own article. Even if charted, I'm not sure what impact/global significance it has made/achieved. It doesn't come across as notable enough to have its own article. 174.252.36.62 ( talk) 19:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fading (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
1111tomica (
talk ·
contribs) 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Another reviewer is need because the current one is also a part Wikiproject Rihanna and could be bias.
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · count) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No. Has had an AFD within the past two weeks. This led to major expansion which shows has not been stable during its nomination | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
The writers are in correct for this song. Ester Dean did not write this song. Quintin Amey p.k.a King Epiq wrote the lyrics of this song. [2] Check info on Itunes for the song and it will tell you that. The song had the wrong credits for the first shipments of the album and then they went on to correct that afterwards. Some websites even have the correct writers listed besides wikipedia if you search google. Rodgerdat ( talk) 05:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
This song has the wrong writers listed and it violates the copyright of the song and the writers of the song. The correct list of producers and writers should be reflected. [3] Polow Da Don and William Hodge are producers and Quintin Amey is the writer who owns this body of work. This is the third request to edit this song and it is actually not a good policy to not allow changes that affect copyright violations. More research should have been done on who the writers are and updated as soon as that info was and is public now. Article will be flagged over and over again if not responded to. As the writers of this song are being violated due to copyrights. Thanks. This following cite is the ascap shares of the song which does not involve Ester Dean. [3] Rodgerdat ( talk) 18:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fading (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Fading (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
1111tomica (
talk ·
contribs) 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Another reviewer is need because the current one is also a part Wikiproject Rihanna and could be bias.
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · count) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No. Has had an AFD within the past two weeks. This led to major expansion which shows has not been stable during its nomination | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
The writers are in correct for this song. Ester Dean did not write this song. Quintin Amey p.k.a King Epiq wrote the lyrics of this song. [1] Check info on Itunes for the song and it will tell you that. The song had the wrong credits for the first shipments of the album and then they went on to correct that afterwards. Some websites even have the correct writers listed besides wikipedia if you search google. Rodgerdat ( talk) 05:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Is there any possible way that we can break up these two sections? To flesh out the article more? Would anyone be opposed to me attempting to do that?-- mikomango mwa! 13:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs) 04:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll do this in several steps. Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Looks good | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Looks good | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Good | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Good | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Good | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Good | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Stable per criteria | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
An image used in this article,
File:Ester Dean.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
Here Aaron • You Da One 13:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
What is the source for the length being 3:20? iTunes lists it as 3:27. -- 189.30.247.20 ( talk) 17:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Since this song is not a single or even a promotional single, I find it questionable to give this its own article. Even if charted, I'm not sure what impact/global significance it has made/achieved. It doesn't come across as notable enough to have its own article. 174.252.36.62 ( talk) 19:43, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fading (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer:
1111tomica (
talk ·
contribs) 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Another reviewer is need because the current one is also a part Wikiproject Rihanna and could be bias.
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs · count) 05:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No. Has had an AFD within the past two weeks. This led to major expansion which shows has not been stable during its nomination | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
The writers are in correct for this song. Ester Dean did not write this song. Quintin Amey p.k.a King Epiq wrote the lyrics of this song. [2] Check info on Itunes for the song and it will tell you that. The song had the wrong credits for the first shipments of the album and then they went on to correct that afterwards. Some websites even have the correct writers listed besides wikipedia if you search google. Rodgerdat ( talk) 05:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
This song has the wrong writers listed and it violates the copyright of the song and the writers of the song. The correct list of producers and writers should be reflected. [3] Polow Da Don and William Hodge are producers and Quintin Amey is the writer who owns this body of work. This is the third request to edit this song and it is actually not a good policy to not allow changes that affect copyright violations. More research should have been done on who the writers are and updated as soon as that info was and is public now. Article will be flagged over and over again if not responded to. As the writers of this song are being violated due to copyrights. Thanks. This following cite is the ascap shares of the song which does not involve Ester Dean. [3] Rodgerdat ( talk) 18:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)