Facundo has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an
educational assignment in Spring 2008 at the
University of British Columbia. Further details are available
on the course page. bessiec, Hector Argene, and Mjlee27 thank the FA-Team and WikiProject Novels for their help. Revision summary: 12 January, 2008, 926 revisions, 17 April, 2008. GA status achieved. |
Because this talk page has been rather busy, there's perhaps a danger of some of the points raised further up the page being missed. I've distilled the remaining outstanding issues into a new list below - hopefully I haven't overlooked any. Hope this helps in the final run-up to GA! EyeSerene talk 09:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Mike Christie's copyedit comments:
Outstanding sourcing issues from jbmurray:
Sentence clarity per Michael Devore:
Further comments from EyeSerene following more copyediting:
One more comment from Mike Christie after copyediting:
Hey! I apreciate everything that you have done for us! I hope with can get the GA satus soon, what else we need? Thanks again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hector Argene ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to try to do another pass this morning; I'll drop notes here as I find things to ask about.
-- More as I find things. Mike Christie (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if the writers here want to try FAC, but I do see the need for more work on the article. I'm poor at keeping specific lists as I copyedit, but...
I can go back to earlier sections of the article and provide more feedback if the writers are still participating here. It's a very good article and an interesting topic, especially being a work of "creative non-fiction". – Outriggr § 04:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MBelgrano ( talk) 15:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I could fix the initial reference to page 94 of Sarmiento 2003, which accidentally reused the reftag sarm93; but to check the repeated references named sarm93 the book is required. -- Cat's paw ( talk) 21:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Facundo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Facundo has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an
educational assignment in Spring 2008 at the
University of British Columbia. Further details are available
on the course page. bessiec, Hector Argene, and Mjlee27 thank the FA-Team and WikiProject Novels for their help. Revision summary: 12 January, 2008, 926 revisions, 17 April, 2008. GA status achieved. |
Because this talk page has been rather busy, there's perhaps a danger of some of the points raised further up the page being missed. I've distilled the remaining outstanding issues into a new list below - hopefully I haven't overlooked any. Hope this helps in the final run-up to GA! EyeSerene talk 09:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Mike Christie's copyedit comments:
Outstanding sourcing issues from jbmurray:
Sentence clarity per Michael Devore:
Further comments from EyeSerene following more copyediting:
One more comment from Mike Christie after copyediting:
Hey! I apreciate everything that you have done for us! I hope with can get the GA satus soon, what else we need? Thanks again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hector Argene ( talk • contribs) 22:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to try to do another pass this morning; I'll drop notes here as I find things to ask about.
-- More as I find things. Mike Christie (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if the writers here want to try FAC, but I do see the need for more work on the article. I'm poor at keeping specific lists as I copyedit, but...
I can go back to earlier sections of the article and provide more feedback if the writers are still participating here. It's a very good article and an interesting topic, especially being a work of "creative non-fiction". – Outriggr § 04:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MBelgrano ( talk) 15:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I could fix the initial reference to page 94 of Sarmiento 2003, which accidentally reused the reftag sarm93; but to check the repeated references named sarm93 the book is required. -- Cat's paw ( talk) 21:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Facundo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)