This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Erich Hartmann article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 120 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Erich Hartmann has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones Date Process Result April 17, 2008 WikiProject peer review Reviewed May 1, 2008 Good article nominee Listed May 6, 2008 WikiProject A-class review Approved August 10, 2008 Featured article candidate Not promoted January 18, 2019 Good article reassessment Delisted July 23, 2019 Good article nominee Listed Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on September 20, 2021, and September 20, 2022. Current status: Good article

This   level-5 vital article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Germany Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Biography This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article is supported by the aerospace biography project. This article has passed an A-Class review. Military history: Aviation / Biography / European / German / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military biography task force European military history task force German military history task force World War II task force Additional information: /  This article has passed an A-Class review.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I'm curious. The infobox currently qualifies the "war crimes" section as "alleged" with a criminal status of "pardoned". But the main narrative makes no mention of any pardon, only his conviction, so the pardon is currently not sourced. If he was indeed pardoned, a pardon does not, I believe, overturn the original conviction, so "alleged" cannot be an appropriate qualification. If his original conviction was declared unlawful by the Russians in 1997, as this edit summary asserts, then "alleged" would be appropriate, and possibly even grounds for excluding any mention of "war crimes" in the infobox, but that assertion is not reflected anywhere in the article. Interested to know the facts. Factotem ( talk) 22:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Now reads "Fabricated war crimes", based on a statement in the lead. I notice that this was previously mentioned in the main body, but removed with this edit with a reason of unreliable sourcing. I've now tagged the "fabricated" and "pardoned" claims with cite needed lead. Factotem ( talk) 09:31, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

@ MisterBee1966: As best I can tell, the source for this edit, in which it is asserted that "In January 1997, more than three years after his death, Hartmann was rehabilitated by the Chief Military Prosecutor of the Russian Federation and relieved of all charges against him. The government agency stated that Hartmann had been wrongly convicted", says only that an examination of the criminal cases showed that Hartmann was convicted without cause ("Die Prüfung beider Strafsachen hat ergeben, daß E. Hartmann und andere zusammen mit ihm zum zweiten Mal verurteilte Kriegsgefangene ohne Grund verurteilt wurden. p. 78). That the examination was conducted by a Russian govt. agency seems to be documented on p. 55, though my German is not good enough to wade through the whole section to be sure of that. More importantly, the source only supports the assertion that Hartmann was wrongly convicted. I can't see anywhere any support for the assertion that he was exonerated in January 1997. A search for "januar" in the section in which the cited pages appear gives 5 hits, none of which relate to 1997. Are you able to tie down the source to support the first sentence of that edit? Also, the distinction between being pardoned and being relieved of all charges is important. The former means he was guilty of war crimes, the latter that he was wrongfully convicted of war crimes. Factotem ( talk) 13:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• I don't believe that Hartmann was rehabilitated, as only a court can do that. Wagenlehner is a collection of documents pertaining to the efforts to vacate convictions of German POWs, but it does not appear that it happened, at least in re Hartmann. I think it would be fair to say: "in the opinion of the Chief Military Prosecutor of the Russian Federation published in 1999 (?), Hartmann had been wrongly convicted.{{sfn|Wagenlehner|1999|p=78}}" Also, given that opinion, I support removing section "War crimes" from the infobox. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply
• I am open minded as to how to present the information in the infox. Hartmann was tried twice, twice he was convicted, therefore I believe it should be reflected in the infobox. I can send the full scan from the Wagenlehner book to anyone interested via email. MisterBee1966 ( talk) 18:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Regardless of whether Hartmann was later exonerated, and it doesn't look like there are sources to support that, I think if you have a section titled "War crimes" in the infobox, even if it's qualified with "Alleged" or "Fabricated", it tends to suggest that he committed war crimes. The infobox isn't at all good at accommodating nuanced situations like this, and I think the best solution is to remove that section completely. Let the issue be covered properly in the main body, the lead text even, but not the infobox. Factotem ( talk) 19:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Fair point, I will remove it. Your assumption about sources not supporting him being exonerated is false. As said, I gladly scan and send you the full text. MisterBee1966 ( talk) 20:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks, but the source is available online. If there are other pages that explicitly state he was exonerated then please do add them, but I checked the page you provided in the ref, and it doesn't support the statement. I'm not fluent in German, but I'm not a beginner either, and Google Translate can fill the gaps. Factotem ( talk) 20:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

I added a online reference which states "Hauptmilitärstaatsanwaltschaft in Moskau hat Hartmann inzwischen voll rehabilitiert und die Verurteilungen als grundlos bezeichnet." which translates to "The main military prosecutor's office in Moscow has meanwhile fully rehabilitated Hartmann and called the convictions groundless." I assume de:LEO-BW to be a reliable source in context of Wikipedia. Cheers MisterBee1966 ( talk) 20:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Not too jazzed with leo-bw as a high quality source for military history, but it seems to be supported by some respectable institutions in Baden-Württemberg, so fair enough. There's also an article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper. It's paywalled, but it shows just enough to confirm that the military prosecutor's office cleared Hartmann. Factotem ( talk) 20:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

You may also want to search for "Leonid Kopalin" who headed the rehabilitation agency in the military prosecutor's office in Moscow. MisterBee1966 ( talk) 21:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

I read the date wrong. Your articles are still poorly written--and cause confusion like that for that very reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.122.63.135 ( talk • contribs) 05:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC) reply

"In an attempt to pressure him into service with the Soviet-friendly East German National People's Army, he was tried on war crimes charges and convicted."

"National People's Army Founded 1 March 1956"

Wat - 01:35, 1 August 2021‎ 46.150.175.21

In occupied Germany, the Western zones founded the Federal Republic of Germany in May 1949, and the Soviet Zone was made the German Democratic Republic in October 1949. They were not sovereign, and had no official army or airforce yet. The commies made concealed preparations, see History of the Volkspolizei. -- 193.159.103.128 ( talk) 11:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC) reply