This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone please help me to clean up the grammar on this page. It is quite terrible at times. Thanks.
Jonelliott 16:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I will be transferring in a few days/weeks some of the economic policy info (all the way down to the fiscal imbalance) including the three budgets (including 2008) to a new article, although there is already article on both Harper budgets, maybe some of the budget info should be added into those two which will give more info then was it has right now. If any editor would have to add more economic material (i.e the Canadian dollar, oil, etc.) Any objection for that?-- JForget 01:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I added this (again) because this page remains only a rehash of Conservative Party press releases and supporting commentary by allied media/pundits; there is nothing here about the Omnibus bills, native policy, democratic (non-)reform, or the provinces' or public's views about and so much more; this is advertising. I'd proposed deletion back during the 2011 campaign and openly POV/avowed conservative-ideology votes were counted against me, and I wound up blocked; it was for that reason I boycotted Wikipedia for a long time (only two edits in 2012, in fact) until I noticed that anti-native propagandists were POVizing and vandalizing the Idle No More and Theresa Spence articles, all on the same talking-points as Tory politicians; IMO all this series of articles need retitling to "Domestic policy of the Government of Canada". "Harper government" might seem ordinary to non-Canadians but it's well-known and scandalous in Canada that this government ordered bureaucrats to start using "Harper government" instead of "Government of Canada" on letterhead and in press releases. This is a POV ad-page and should not be up under this title, or with its current content, come the next election campaign (really already underway though the date has not yet been picked). As someone noted in discussing one of the others in the series, the article is flawed from the start as speaking from the Tory angle, with criticism only marginally included; the framework is Tory, pure and simple; the person who created these articles made the jejune argument that he thought it was "interesting" material about "an important prime minister" even though they were started just after Harper came to power in 2006; I hear that 'interesting' claim on things like the POV attack re Adrian Dix (see Talk:Adrian Dix) and the onslaught from mining industry p.r. hacks on Talk:Mount Polley mine disaster and elsewhere; disingenuous "interest".
Not that Wikipedians are known for their political acumen or fairness or their willingness to take on hard realpolitik about wikipedia being used as a p.r. platform for anyone with enough money to pay or recruit "volunteers" to churn out stuff like this; no doubt there will be equivocations posted defended this article on "guideline" and "sources" grounds; but it's POV as hell and meant as advertising, and there are other sources than those plumping up this government than those already here; back in 2011 I was finding Harper-mentions on all kinds of town and building/infrastructure articles of the "Harper gave away some money", "Harper slept here", "Harper cut a ribbon here" and so on.....then I found these. These remain offensive as POV spew and have decidedly controversial titles; yet the AfD was decided by a then-teen in Scotland based on biased attacks on me by conservatives in Australia and Virginia; none of whom know the Canadian political milieu or realize the monopoly-ownership nature of Canadian "reliable sources" (mainstream media). I see the Environmental policy of the Harper government article has a lot more "balance" by way of criticism but it, too, started out as advertising; the Foreign policy of the Harper government was a straightforward revisionist account of Canadian political history filtered through Tory-speak, and made little mention of what had come before. Where it stands now I don't want to look, the subject is nauseating and an embarrassment to the 60% of Canadians who do not like where he has taken the country, and are mortified by our new international image as a hawkish petro state with a bad record for exploitive and murderous mining practices in other countries.
Same as domestically, it's not the same country we knew, we don't recognize it anymore, just like he bragged to Republicans in the US before their help in getting elected to power in 2006. Not that I'm going to watchlist this again, but this was missing a POV tag; and really needs t he advert tag, which I see was removed frmo the environmental policy one with the claim "POV is enough, advert not necessary", as if biased content and spammmishness were the same thing; they're not, but again there you have a lack of political acumen and lack of acquaintance with the political milieu acting in the dark; or disingenuously; though that article has lots of anti-Harper POV now...it was still written and conceived from a Tory propaganda perspective. and should not be online during an election campaign as it's just advertising and very blatantly so and taht is against the law in Canada unless the cash value of the work is declared as election expenses and approved by the Chief Electoral Officer. Arguments that Canadian law does not apply are not valid; American border stations make a point of not violating that law, because of the size of their market in Canada; same should apply to Wikiepdia, where discretion should be more common than blind equivocation....but isn't. Skookum1 ( talk) 07:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Domestic policy of the Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/CanadaVotes/News/2008/10/14/7085011-cp.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070425/tories_climate_070426/20070426?hub=TopStoriesWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060925/surplus_payment_060925/20060925?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070319/budget2007_opprx_070319/20070319/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 37 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070319/budget_PERSONAL_FINANCE_070319?s_name=&no_ads=,{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060502/budget_agriculture_060502?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070321/kelowna_vote_070321?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080408/bill_recall_080408/20080408/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080611/mcguinty_credits_080610/20080611/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080410/Polley_taxcredit_080410/20080410/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080314/immigration_reforms_080314?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080415/fetus_bill_080415/20080415/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061110/drunk_driving_061110/20061110?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080414/car_thefts_080414/20080414/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060215/tory_gunregistry_060215/20060216/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060619/tories_registry_060619/20060619/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071116/longgun_registry_071116/20071116/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090401/gun_registry_090401/20090401/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060913/gun_control_060913/20060913/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070410/longgun_registry_070410/20070410/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070418/registry_amnesty_070418/20070418/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060913/gun_control_060913/20060913/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061206/mtl_massacre_061206/20061206/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060627/gunregistry_study_060627/20060627/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070403/wait_times_070404/20070404?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061022/heart_strategy_061022/20061023/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061208/chemical_ban_061208/20061208?hub=TopStoriesWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I propose merging Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government and Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government into this article. I'd argue that it's better to be organized and have only two seperate articles rather than four. Both economic policy and environmental policy are pretty short too so it won't really do much harm if we add them to domestic policy. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 06:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Mottezen that rule was from 2007, when devices weren't able to handle such large articles. Plus I don't see articles such as Howard Government being split into multiple articles. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 21:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Kawnhr and User:Mottezen you guys voted in the previous consensus so I'm taking your thoughts into account. Let's settle on a compromise. We can at least merge Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government with Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government...that would be under 60kB. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 03:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
It is a bit small indeed. However, the current article is almost exclusively based on the first two years of his premiership. It lists expenditures to each departments in the 2006 budget, and summarizes early initiatives of his administration that may or may not have come to pass in the described form. I encourage you to compare my draft with the first version of the merged article (see in the page history), and judge for yourself whether the text I removed is worth keeping. Mottezen ( talk) 16:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
I’m not proposing to create a new article + I already deleted the excessive details. Just copy-paste my draft in the domestic policy article et voilà. Mottezen ( talk) 04:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone please help me to clean up the grammar on this page. It is quite terrible at times. Thanks.
Jonelliott 16:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I will be transferring in a few days/weeks some of the economic policy info (all the way down to the fiscal imbalance) including the three budgets (including 2008) to a new article, although there is already article on both Harper budgets, maybe some of the budget info should be added into those two which will give more info then was it has right now. If any editor would have to add more economic material (i.e the Canadian dollar, oil, etc.) Any objection for that?-- JForget 01:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I added this (again) because this page remains only a rehash of Conservative Party press releases and supporting commentary by allied media/pundits; there is nothing here about the Omnibus bills, native policy, democratic (non-)reform, or the provinces' or public's views about and so much more; this is advertising. I'd proposed deletion back during the 2011 campaign and openly POV/avowed conservative-ideology votes were counted against me, and I wound up blocked; it was for that reason I boycotted Wikipedia for a long time (only two edits in 2012, in fact) until I noticed that anti-native propagandists were POVizing and vandalizing the Idle No More and Theresa Spence articles, all on the same talking-points as Tory politicians; IMO all this series of articles need retitling to "Domestic policy of the Government of Canada". "Harper government" might seem ordinary to non-Canadians but it's well-known and scandalous in Canada that this government ordered bureaucrats to start using "Harper government" instead of "Government of Canada" on letterhead and in press releases. This is a POV ad-page and should not be up under this title, or with its current content, come the next election campaign (really already underway though the date has not yet been picked). As someone noted in discussing one of the others in the series, the article is flawed from the start as speaking from the Tory angle, with criticism only marginally included; the framework is Tory, pure and simple; the person who created these articles made the jejune argument that he thought it was "interesting" material about "an important prime minister" even though they were started just after Harper came to power in 2006; I hear that 'interesting' claim on things like the POV attack re Adrian Dix (see Talk:Adrian Dix) and the onslaught from mining industry p.r. hacks on Talk:Mount Polley mine disaster and elsewhere; disingenuous "interest".
Not that Wikipedians are known for their political acumen or fairness or their willingness to take on hard realpolitik about wikipedia being used as a p.r. platform for anyone with enough money to pay or recruit "volunteers" to churn out stuff like this; no doubt there will be equivocations posted defended this article on "guideline" and "sources" grounds; but it's POV as hell and meant as advertising, and there are other sources than those plumping up this government than those already here; back in 2011 I was finding Harper-mentions on all kinds of town and building/infrastructure articles of the "Harper gave away some money", "Harper slept here", "Harper cut a ribbon here" and so on.....then I found these. These remain offensive as POV spew and have decidedly controversial titles; yet the AfD was decided by a then-teen in Scotland based on biased attacks on me by conservatives in Australia and Virginia; none of whom know the Canadian political milieu or realize the monopoly-ownership nature of Canadian "reliable sources" (mainstream media). I see the Environmental policy of the Harper government article has a lot more "balance" by way of criticism but it, too, started out as advertising; the Foreign policy of the Harper government was a straightforward revisionist account of Canadian political history filtered through Tory-speak, and made little mention of what had come before. Where it stands now I don't want to look, the subject is nauseating and an embarrassment to the 60% of Canadians who do not like where he has taken the country, and are mortified by our new international image as a hawkish petro state with a bad record for exploitive and murderous mining practices in other countries.
Same as domestically, it's not the same country we knew, we don't recognize it anymore, just like he bragged to Republicans in the US before their help in getting elected to power in 2006. Not that I'm going to watchlist this again, but this was missing a POV tag; and really needs t he advert tag, which I see was removed frmo the environmental policy one with the claim "POV is enough, advert not necessary", as if biased content and spammmishness were the same thing; they're not, but again there you have a lack of political acumen and lack of acquaintance with the political milieu acting in the dark; or disingenuously; though that article has lots of anti-Harper POV now...it was still written and conceived from a Tory propaganda perspective. and should not be online during an election campaign as it's just advertising and very blatantly so and taht is against the law in Canada unless the cash value of the work is declared as election expenses and approved by the Chief Electoral Officer. Arguments that Canadian law does not apply are not valid; American border stations make a point of not violating that law, because of the size of their market in Canada; same should apply to Wikiepdia, where discretion should be more common than blind equivocation....but isn't. Skookum1 ( talk) 07:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Domestic policy of the Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/CanadaVotes/News/2008/10/14/7085011-cp.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070425/tories_climate_070426/20070426?hub=TopStoriesWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060925/surplus_payment_060925/20060925?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070319/budget2007_opprx_070319/20070319/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 37 external links on Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070319/budget_PERSONAL_FINANCE_070319?s_name=&no_ads=,{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060502/budget_agriculture_060502?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070321/kelowna_vote_070321?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080408/bill_recall_080408/20080408/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080611/mcguinty_credits_080610/20080611/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080410/Polley_taxcredit_080410/20080410/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080314/immigration_reforms_080314?s_name=&no_ads={{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080415/fetus_bill_080415/20080415/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061110/drunk_driving_061110/20061110?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080414/car_thefts_080414/20080414/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060215/tory_gunregistry_060215/20060216/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060619/tories_registry_060619/20060619/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071116/longgun_registry_071116/20071116/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090401/gun_registry_090401/20090401/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060913/gun_control_060913/20060913/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070410/longgun_registry_070410/20070410/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070418/registry_amnesty_070418/20070418/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060913/gun_control_060913/20060913/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061206/mtl_massacre_061206/20061206/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060627/gunregistry_study_060627/20060627/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070403/wait_times_070404/20070404?hub=TopStories{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061022/heart_strategy_061022/20061023/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061208/chemical_ban_061208/20061208?hub=TopStoriesWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I propose merging Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government and Environmental policy of the Stephen Harper government into this article. I'd argue that it's better to be organized and have only two seperate articles rather than four. Both economic policy and environmental policy are pretty short too so it won't really do much harm if we add them to domestic policy. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 06:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Mottezen that rule was from 2007, when devices weren't able to handle such large articles. Plus I don't see articles such as Howard Government being split into multiple articles. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 21:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Kawnhr and User:Mottezen you guys voted in the previous consensus so I'm taking your thoughts into account. Let's settle on a compromise. We can at least merge Economic policy of the Stephen Harper government with Domestic policy of the Stephen Harper government...that would be under 60kB. Ak-eater06 ( talk) 03:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
It is a bit small indeed. However, the current article is almost exclusively based on the first two years of his premiership. It lists expenditures to each departments in the 2006 budget, and summarizes early initiatives of his administration that may or may not have come to pass in the described form. I encourage you to compare my draft with the first version of the merged article (see in the page history), and judge for yourself whether the text I removed is worth keeping. Mottezen ( talk) 16:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
I’m not proposing to create a new article + I already deleted the excessive details. Just copy-paste my draft in the domestic policy article et voilà. Mottezen ( talk) 04:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)