Endoscopic foreign body retrieval was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 8, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
spoons,
eyeglasses, and
toothbrushes have been removed from
stomachs using
endoscopic foreign body retrieval techniques with specialized cameras? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The pictures are awesome. The article could use a little cosmetic care and buffing but looks pretty good overall. Do you think it's worth including something on removal of rectal foreign bodies? MastCell 05:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I think this article is a little limited in scope to be GA
-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Endoscopic foreign body retrieval was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 8, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that
spoons,
eyeglasses, and
toothbrushes have been removed from
stomachs using
endoscopic foreign body retrieval techniques with specialized cameras? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The pictures are awesome. The article could use a little cosmetic care and buffing but looks pretty good overall. Do you think it's worth including something on removal of rectal foreign bodies? MastCell 05:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I think this article is a little limited in scope to be GA
-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)