This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: no objection. -- tariqabjotu 13:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Elizabeth Lodge 215 F & A M → Elizabeth Hall (New Blaine, Arkansas) – Article was moved to current title without discussion. Elizabeth Hall is the more accurate name for the building (it's what is used repeatedly in the text of the cited Arkansas Preservation article on the building). There is a cemetery next to it (and directly associated with it) that is known as the Elizabeth Hall Cemetery. While "Elizabeth Lodge 215, F & AM" is used in the NRHP listing (it gives "Elizabeth Hall" as an alternative)... that name is more accurately applied to the local Masonic chapter that meets in the building. Distinguishing between the two prevents potential confusion. Blueboar ( talk) 22:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
First let me say that I think the article is overall fine, and while I would prefer it be located at the "Elizabeth Lodge 215 F & A M" name documented in the Arkansas website linked, i don't care terribly much and the "Elizabeth Hall" name is also okay (and yes it is also documented as valid, at that website).
But the recent edits are getting my attention anyhow. Possibly too-flowery language, like the just-added assertion that the building was built by the Masonic "brethren" of the lodge, seem unencyclopedic. And then i notice the source states that land and lumber was donated by Masonic members of the lodge, but about the construction, states: "Construction was carried out under the supervision of the New Blaine sheriff, E. N. Griffeth." Actually, I am guessing what that means is that the building was built by prison labor! Once it occurs to me, i am pretty sure that it what is meant, that the language used is "code" for explaining that. Think about Paul Newman and Cool Hand Luke. -- do ncr am 16:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: no objection. -- tariqabjotu 13:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Elizabeth Lodge 215 F & A M → Elizabeth Hall (New Blaine, Arkansas) – Article was moved to current title without discussion. Elizabeth Hall is the more accurate name for the building (it's what is used repeatedly in the text of the cited Arkansas Preservation article on the building). There is a cemetery next to it (and directly associated with it) that is known as the Elizabeth Hall Cemetery. While "Elizabeth Lodge 215, F & AM" is used in the NRHP listing (it gives "Elizabeth Hall" as an alternative)... that name is more accurately applied to the local Masonic chapter that meets in the building. Distinguishing between the two prevents potential confusion. Blueboar ( talk) 22:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
First let me say that I think the article is overall fine, and while I would prefer it be located at the "Elizabeth Lodge 215 F & A M" name documented in the Arkansas website linked, i don't care terribly much and the "Elizabeth Hall" name is also okay (and yes it is also documented as valid, at that website).
But the recent edits are getting my attention anyhow. Possibly too-flowery language, like the just-added assertion that the building was built by the Masonic "brethren" of the lodge, seem unencyclopedic. And then i notice the source states that land and lumber was donated by Masonic members of the lodge, but about the construction, states: "Construction was carried out under the supervision of the New Blaine sheriff, E. N. Griffeth." Actually, I am guessing what that means is that the building was built by prison labor! Once it occurs to me, i am pretty sure that it what is meant, that the language used is "code" for explaining that. Think about Paul Newman and Cool Hand Luke. -- do ncr am 16:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)