Eileen Niedfield is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Fortunaa ( talk) at 12:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: American physician and Roman Catholic nun |
Eileen Niedfield was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 28, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Maxim Masiutin ( talk · contribs) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Fortunaa!
While reviewing, I filled in the missing "importance" values for the Wikiprojects templates. Could you please check the importance criteria defined by each Wikiproject to ensure all importance values are set correctly?
Also, can you please take care of the {{Short description}}, which should not contain a trailing dot and should preferably be shorter than it is today? Could you please check the whole set of recommendations at Wikipedia:Short_description? maybe you will have ideas on how to shorten it so you can edit it.
Maxim Masiutin ( talk · contribs) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Fortunaa!
Thank you for your contribution in writing and submitting the biography article about Eileen Rae Niedfield for Wikipedia's Good Article review. As a reviewer, I thoroughly read the article with great interest, finding it to be engaging and well-written. The prose is clear, concise, and accessible to a wide range of readers. I have made necessary corrections to spelling and grammar errors throughout.
The article adheres to the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections; however, there seemed to be a lack of concluding sentences in the lead section. To address this, I added a closing sentence. Additionally, while it was mentioned that Niedfield belonged to one of the first cohorts of women graduates from Georgetown University Medical School, no specific year was provided in the lead section. Therefore, I included this detail.
Regarding sources, all references are verifiable and presented appropriately according to Wikipedia's layout style guidelines. Inline citations support information from reliable sources; however, there were some claims lacking proper sourcing or citation at the end of paragraphs. To rectify this issue, I utilized ancestry.com as a source for dates and found an additional newspaper source mentioning her work with Mother Teresa.
Regarding legality and originality concerns, I conducted thorough checks using tools such as Copyleaks, which confirmed that there are no copyright violations or instances of plagiarism within the article content. As a reviewer, I was obliged to check that.
The coverage provided by the article is comprehensive as it encompasses various stages of Niedfield's life including her family background and legacy among other aspects related to her biography. The focus remains on-topic without delving into unnecessary details.
It is important to note that your substantial solo effort in writing most parts of this article is greatly appreciated! The stability criterion is also met since no significant changes or ongoing disputes regarding its content or edit wars have been observed thus far.
While photographs within the article are adequately tagged with copyright statuses and accompanied by suitable captions enhancing its visual appeal, further images could potentially be sourced from newspapers; obtaining permissions may require extra effort but would enhance the overall presentation. Still, these extra images are not necessary from the point of view of a GA criteria reviewer, but as an editor, in the future, adding such images may improve the article.
Please see the edits that I made to the article, and let me know what you think of these edits and of the short description of the article I mentioned earlier.
Maxim Masiutin ( talk) 01:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This GA review is retracted and the article nominee returns to the backlog for pending review, as requested on https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AGood_article_nominations&diff=1186450459&oldid=1186444458 Maxim Masiutin ( talk) 07:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 13:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Comments will follow in the next couple of days. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A random spotcheck of citations to ensure there are no plagiarism, close paraphrasing, or original research. Fortunaa, could you please provide a quotation of the relevant information for the following sources, if possible
Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Fortunaa ( talk · contribs) 12:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: HistoryTheorist ( talk · contribs) 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I look forward to reviewing this article. Depending on my schedule, a full review might not come until next weekend, but I hope to review this article in bits and pieces over the week. This review will focus on making original research issues and the other MOS details Airship mentioned, as I trust (but will verify) that the other aspects they checked remain up to GA standards. ❤History Theorist❤ 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
descended from German immigrants and converted from Lutheranism to Catholicism as a young man. All I'm seeing is a record of Niedfield's birth and death dates along with a listing of her parents.
with a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry, magna cum laude,nor
Niedfield took her perpetual vows on August 15, 1945, and her final vows a year later on August 15, 1946.
It was then known as the Catholic Colored Clinic in Atlanta, and later as Southwest Atlanta Hospital, now closednor the 1947 date.
Eileen Niedfield is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Fortunaa ( talk) at 12:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: American physician and Roman Catholic nun |
Eileen Niedfield was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 28, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Maxim Masiutin ( talk · contribs) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Fortunaa!
While reviewing, I filled in the missing "importance" values for the Wikiprojects templates. Could you please check the importance criteria defined by each Wikiproject to ensure all importance values are set correctly?
Also, can you please take care of the {{Short description}}, which should not contain a trailing dot and should preferably be shorter than it is today? Could you please check the whole set of recommendations at Wikipedia:Short_description? maybe you will have ideas on how to shorten it so you can edit it.
Maxim Masiutin ( talk · contribs) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Fortunaa!
Thank you for your contribution in writing and submitting the biography article about Eileen Rae Niedfield for Wikipedia's Good Article review. As a reviewer, I thoroughly read the article with great interest, finding it to be engaging and well-written. The prose is clear, concise, and accessible to a wide range of readers. I have made necessary corrections to spelling and grammar errors throughout.
The article adheres to the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections; however, there seemed to be a lack of concluding sentences in the lead section. To address this, I added a closing sentence. Additionally, while it was mentioned that Niedfield belonged to one of the first cohorts of women graduates from Georgetown University Medical School, no specific year was provided in the lead section. Therefore, I included this detail.
Regarding sources, all references are verifiable and presented appropriately according to Wikipedia's layout style guidelines. Inline citations support information from reliable sources; however, there were some claims lacking proper sourcing or citation at the end of paragraphs. To rectify this issue, I utilized ancestry.com as a source for dates and found an additional newspaper source mentioning her work with Mother Teresa.
Regarding legality and originality concerns, I conducted thorough checks using tools such as Copyleaks, which confirmed that there are no copyright violations or instances of plagiarism within the article content. As a reviewer, I was obliged to check that.
The coverage provided by the article is comprehensive as it encompasses various stages of Niedfield's life including her family background and legacy among other aspects related to her biography. The focus remains on-topic without delving into unnecessary details.
It is important to note that your substantial solo effort in writing most parts of this article is greatly appreciated! The stability criterion is also met since no significant changes or ongoing disputes regarding its content or edit wars have been observed thus far.
While photographs within the article are adequately tagged with copyright statuses and accompanied by suitable captions enhancing its visual appeal, further images could potentially be sourced from newspapers; obtaining permissions may require extra effort but would enhance the overall presentation. Still, these extra images are not necessary from the point of view of a GA criteria reviewer, but as an editor, in the future, adding such images may improve the article.
Please see the edits that I made to the article, and let me know what you think of these edits and of the short description of the article I mentioned earlier.
Maxim Masiutin ( talk) 01:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This GA review is retracted and the article nominee returns to the backlog for pending review, as requested on https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AGood_article_nominations&diff=1186450459&oldid=1186444458 Maxim Masiutin ( talk) 07:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 13:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this review. Comments will follow in the next couple of days. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 13:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A random spotcheck of citations to ensure there are no plagiarism, close paraphrasing, or original research. Fortunaa, could you please provide a quotation of the relevant information for the following sources, if possible
Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 22:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Fortunaa ( talk · contribs) 12:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: HistoryTheorist ( talk · contribs) 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I look forward to reviewing this article. Depending on my schedule, a full review might not come until next weekend, but I hope to review this article in bits and pieces over the week. This review will focus on making original research issues and the other MOS details Airship mentioned, as I trust (but will verify) that the other aspects they checked remain up to GA standards. ❤History Theorist❤ 02:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
descended from German immigrants and converted from Lutheranism to Catholicism as a young man. All I'm seeing is a record of Niedfield's birth and death dates along with a listing of her parents.
with a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry, magna cum laude,nor
Niedfield took her perpetual vows on August 15, 1945, and her final vows a year later on August 15, 1946.
It was then known as the Catholic Colored Clinic in Atlanta, and later as Southwest Atlanta Hospital, now closednor the 1947 date.