From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Golden ( talk · contribs) 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden talk 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • from Santa Cruz - It is not clear from the sentence whether he is originally from Santa Cruz or if he resided there while serving as a party-list member.
  • Santa Cruz is linked for the second time in the second paragraph.
  • Throughout the article, you have used the names of departments instead of specific locations. I suggest using specific place names. For example, is it not known where in the Cochabamba Department he was born?
  • settled in the capital city - This could easily be misunderstood as the capital of Bolivia, which is not the case. I suggest rephrasing it to something like this: "..settled in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, the capital of Santa Cruz, where he.."
  • settled in the capital city's Plan 3,000 district - The inclusion of the district is unnecessary here since you don't mention anything else about it in the lead.
  • Its of some relevance as the central location of his career: "where he got his start"; "joined his local ..." Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • align his sector - Is this referring to the taxi sector? It would be helpful to clarify that here.
  • bore fruit in the form of -> resulted in
  • It would be useful to include information about how and when he became a member of the Movement for Socialism.

Early life and career

  • "himself" is unnecessary here.
  • Simultaneously to that - "to that" is unnecessary.
  • Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 -> "Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 district"

Chamber of Deputies

  • in the department. -> "in Santa Cruz department."
  • only solidified - "only" is unnecessary.

References

  • Spot-checked references #1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16.
  • I used Google Translate to confirm the sources.
  • No issues were found during spot-checking. All references that were checked support the statements for which they are cited.

External links

  • This page has already been linked in the references. Is it necessary to include it as a separate external link?
  • Not specifically for this article, but I'm trying to keep a level of uniformity between all parliamentarians of this assembly, the final goal being to make it a WP:GTOP. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

General comments

  • Earwig's detector does not show any copyright violations.
  • The only image in the article is relevant and free.
  • This is an engaging article about an interesting person. I look forward to seeing your revisions in response to my suggestions. — Golden talk 10:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    Thank you for the replies, Krisgabwoosh. I'm happy to pass this article. — Golden talk 08:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Golden ( talk · contribs) 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden talk 18:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Lead

  • from Santa Cruz - It is not clear from the sentence whether he is originally from Santa Cruz or if he resided there while serving as a party-list member.
  • Santa Cruz is linked for the second time in the second paragraph.
  • Throughout the article, you have used the names of departments instead of specific locations. I suggest using specific place names. For example, is it not known where in the Cochabamba Department he was born?
  • settled in the capital city - This could easily be misunderstood as the capital of Bolivia, which is not the case. I suggest rephrasing it to something like this: "..settled in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, the capital of Santa Cruz, where he.."
  • settled in the capital city's Plan 3,000 district - The inclusion of the district is unnecessary here since you don't mention anything else about it in the lead.
  • Its of some relevance as the central location of his career: "where he got his start"; "joined his local ..." Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • align his sector - Is this referring to the taxi sector? It would be helpful to clarify that here.
  • bore fruit in the form of -> resulted in
  • It would be useful to include information about how and when he became a member of the Movement for Socialism.

Early life and career

  • "himself" is unnecessary here.
  • Simultaneously to that - "to that" is unnecessary.
  • Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 -> "Santa Cruz's Plan 3,000 district"

Chamber of Deputies

  • in the department. -> "in Santa Cruz department."
  • only solidified - "only" is unnecessary.

References

  • Spot-checked references #1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16.
  • I used Google Translate to confirm the sources.
  • No issues were found during spot-checking. All references that were checked support the statements for which they are cited.

External links

  • This page has already been linked in the references. Is it necessary to include it as a separate external link?
  • Not specifically for this article, but I'm trying to keep a level of uniformity between all parliamentarians of this assembly, the final goal being to make it a WP:GTOP. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

General comments

  • Earwig's detector does not show any copyright violations.
  • The only image in the article is relevant and free.
  • This is an engaging article about an interesting person. I look forward to seeing your revisions in response to my suggestions. — Golden talk 10:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply
    Thank you for the replies, Krisgabwoosh. I'm happy to pass this article. — Golden talk 08:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook