This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that this would be unnecessary disambiguation.
Jenks24 (
talk) 15:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Deliverance Dane → Deliverance Dane (Salem witch trials) – Subject is solely notable for peripheral role in the witch trials. Changing this one name selectively (which is no different than many of the names in the Salem witch trials template) affects consistency. Also, name change/move was done with no discussion or notification.
Quis separabit? 11:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unnecessary disambiguation is unnecessary - and, in fact, harmful.
209.211.131.181 (
talk) 12:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
To respond to the above: it's harmful because it makes the article needlessly difficult to find. A reader shouldn't have to know anything other than the name of the person they're looking for in order to find Wikipedia's article on that person. They definitely shouldn't have to guess at a random disambiguation phrase.
209.211.131.181 (
talk) 21:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. There is no need to use parenthetical disambiguation in this case because it's the only article with this name. Calidum 15:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose as per others
Tiggerjay (
talk) 18:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that this would be unnecessary disambiguation.
Jenks24 (
talk) 15:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Deliverance Dane → Deliverance Dane (Salem witch trials) – Subject is solely notable for peripheral role in the witch trials. Changing this one name selectively (which is no different than many of the names in the Salem witch trials template) affects consistency. Also, name change/move was done with no discussion or notification.
Quis separabit? 11:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Unnecessary disambiguation is unnecessary - and, in fact, harmful.
209.211.131.181 (
talk) 12:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
To respond to the above: it's harmful because it makes the article needlessly difficult to find. A reader shouldn't have to know anything other than the name of the person they're looking for in order to find Wikipedia's article on that person. They definitely shouldn't have to guess at a random disambiguation phrase.
209.211.131.181 (
talk) 21:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. There is no need to use parenthetical disambiguation in this case because it's the only article with this name. Calidum 15:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose as per others
Tiggerjay (
talk) 18:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.