This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Delaware Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Mid-importance). Energy Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Offshore wind farms are a key part of the Obama administration, ..."

This seems like a considerable overstatement. The other day, Interior Secretary Salazar spoke about the potential of offshore wind, but to the best of my knowledge, there isn't even the beginning of a plan to develop it.
—WWoods ( talk) 15:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Delaware Offshore Wind Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111160110/http://www.dnb.com/us/ to http://www.dnb.com/us/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC) reply

The first citation from Businessweek now redirects to a 404 error on Bloomberg. A search for the article title turned up no hits. This citation is intended to support the claim that there was a project called the "Delaware Offshore Wind Farm" but there is no record of this. I believe it refers to the Bluewater Wind Farm and have recommended, on that talk page ( /info/en/?search=Bluewater_Wind) that the useful material on this page be worked into the Bluewater wind page. -- Jellyfish343 ( talk) 18:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Jellyfish343, I was able to easily locate the article by searching Google for its headline: [1]. It is behind a paywall though. Note that in general, dead links should not be deleted just because they are dead, see WP:KDL, and I would assume this is especially true for a print magazine article that happens to have a URL provided. The "Delaware Offshore Wind Farm" also has 1,400 results on Google, and so I am not sure if it is appropriate to merge into a different article. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 18:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Wallyfromdilbert,Thanks for that input about dead links. I didn't know that. Thanks for undoing the edit. As for searching for Delaware Wind Farm on google, is it possible you are getting hits because it's a very generic phrase, not a title of a specific proposed wind farm? I've looked and can't find an actual or proposed farm with that title. You know, I suspect that the original author of this page just titled it "Delaware Offshore Wind Farm" to refer to a a generic thing. But in reality, this is referring to Bluewater Wind. What do you think?

-- Jellyfish343 ( talk) 20:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Jellyfish343, I don't think the term is something generic, as the sources all seem to be discussing the same specific proposal. I have not looked into them enough to determine what the "official" name or most commonly used name is, but the Delaware proposal for a wind farm is separate from the company called Bluewater Wind, although it looks like the proposal was to have Bluewater Wind build the wind farm. Could both of these topics be covered on the same page? I'm not entirely opposed, but I'm not sure, and I think comments from some editors who know more about merging may be useful. The page WP:PM has additional information about how to request a merger that will allow other editors to find it easier. I have not done that process myself, but I can try to help if you want to take a go at it. (Btw, I also updated the dead link in the article to a working one). – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 21:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Wallyfromdilbert, The history is that the State of Delaware put out a request for proposals for a wind farm. Bluewater was the selected winner of that competition. But since then there have been other proposals for other wind farms off the coast of Delaware. So that's why I'm suggesting it does not make sense to have a page called "Delaware Offshore Wind Farm" when we already have the Bluewater page and the Skipjack page. I guess that changing a page name, or merging pages is not an easy thing to do on Wikipedia. I think it's worth doing, however, if you are up for it! How can I help? And, thanks for fixing that link! Jellyfish343 ( talk) 21:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Jellyfish343, I'm not going to oppose you if you want to do the legwork, but how would you suggest the material from this page be merged into the Bluewater Wind page? Creating a new subsection in the "projects" section? – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 01:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC) reply