This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Vermont Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Mid-importance). Buses Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just an FYI: On July 1, 2015, the Deerfield Valley Transit Association officially merged with Connecticut River Transit to become Southeast Vermont Transit. ^[1] I recommend that these two pages should be merged into one, complete with details on how this new company now operates two divisions - a "MOOver" division and a "Current" division. Alex Farley ( talk) 12:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC) reply

This is a regional transit agency, and I created this bare-bones article so that the person who requested on OTRS wouldn't have to slog through the AFC backlog. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 06:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... we are public transit operator serving teh public good, and there are similar articles by other public transit operators in vermont, and we will contact these and other organizations to eliminate the orphan problem.

Randy Schoonmaker randys@moover.com(your reason here) -- Randy Schoonmaker ( talk) 16:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply

It's not a blatant copyright violation, as there are a few terms that are duplicated, but the surrounding text isn't a violation. It is also a regional transportation agency and is notable, but no one has searched for outside links ( here, here, here etc.), but that does not make it un-notable. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 16:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC) reply