This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbaer9, Dognast, Beebedell, Bellis24 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Plloren, Scino23, Skylar2002, Tooth21.
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaydenstoddard.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 29 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Kec30.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2020 and 17 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joy4heart. Peer reviewers: Akanai14, ITBillet.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wpiedra1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Please see article re-name discussion at Talk:Education_of_the_deaf#RfC:_Deciding_on_the_target_name. The outcome may have a major impact to this article's name. -- Noleander ( talk) 17:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
March.5th 2014:
I have edited an errors of spelling and grammar in this article.
/info/en/?search=User:Naiad013/sandbox — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Naiad013 (
talk •
contribs) 01:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
For studies of fine arts and humanities, high culture, integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior and set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes a deaf-related institution, organization or group, see deaf studies.
Seriously? On what amounts to a roadside navigation sign? Is this a sneaky satire, or the real thing?
Too bad Google translate doesn't render visual ASL as one of its output modes. I'd love to watch ten animated fingers boring themselves to death.
The opposite idea is perhaps more practical.
But this, too, could benefit from an industrial-scale cliche filter.
"We were blown away by the caliber of the submissions and the winning teams rose to the challenge by providing concepts that not only inspire marketers, but help brands connect with their customers in a way that has never been seen before."
Sadly, I'm pretty sure that's not satire, either. — MaxEnt 21:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Could this section be fleshed out with references to NIH and WHO newborn screening recommendations? In the United States, deaf education can start around 18 months, and there are early interventions for infants as soon as they are identified - this may be helpful to explain as well, but I'm not sure how it plays out in other countries. - Structure1019 ( talk) 18:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
John Bulwer, an English physician, [20] wrote five works on bodily human communication (particularly gestures). He was the first person in England to propose educating deaf people, [21] outlining plans for an academy in Philocophus and The Dumbe mans academie.
this paragraph should be merged with the Great Britain heading - Structure1019 ( talk) 18:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I notice that the section on teacher training in the United States is missing some schools that offer training for Teachers of the Deaf. It would be beneficial to add McDaniel College, Boston University, and Columbia University to that list. I believe that it is important to also stress that those programs use the bilingual-bicultural ASL-English approach—with the exception for Columbia where there is no one approach since they explore and teach about the different approaches (e.g., cued speech, oral, Total Communication, bilingual-bicultural). It might help, and maintain neutrality, to add other schools offering training for Teachers of the Deaf to that list, indicating the other approaches that they use.
Hoyalzrs ( talk) 04:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Add in the history of deaf education on how in the 1800s they main priority was to teach the deaf about God. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jparkh98 ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
They would try to enforce that if they prayed hard enough, they would be able to hear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
I noticed the very first section of this article is a little repetitive and I saw room for improvement. The first line talks about what deaf education is and I feel it can be worded better. Such as, "deaf education is for those obtaining hearing impairments that way educators can address their differences and suit their individual needs." Also instead of saying "success in the school and community" you can say "success inside the classroom and out in the world". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jianna97circelli ( talk • contribs) 16:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I also found problem with this section of the article as "hearing impairment" as a term is technically accurate, but not the term the community of which this article is about prefers, as I have learned from my professors and friends with whom I have discussed the term. I propose something along the lines of "Deaf education is the education of those whose needs necessitate accommodations based on hearing level" or something of the sort. Accommodations within the IEP vernacular do not lessen the materials but rather change how they are presented so that the student has access to the information. Impairment implies that a person is limited, and in my experience, this does not have to be the case for Deaf or Hard of Hearing people.
AlliH (
talk) 18:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)2/5/2018 AlliH
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Maybe you can elaborate on two different issues about manualism and oralism also you can explain about manualism is a benefit to the students and also oralism to see if that benefit and help the students to succeed also help them develop their language acquisition. Also, you can include the organization that supports oralism or manualism and what their issue about the approaches. but I agree that this section needs to be more elaborate and more details on how both approaches is an issue for students' education.
Good to bring up the issues to see how people would add or suggestion.
-- Tylerhetu21 ( talk) 20:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
You can add more associations or organizations that combine with deaf education. here some idea or thought of an organization that helps teacher by joining this organization and this organization called "American Sign Language Teacher Association" (ASLTA). Here the link to look at it. Maybe you can expand on Deaf Education associations in international instead of focusing on two countries.
Can list of different associations from different countries.
Look good so far, -- Tylerhetu21 ( talk) 20:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Good eye, teaching ASL is not the same thing as Deaf Ed. Nor is teaching in ASL. To be considered Deaf Ed, it should be a different program for those students entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
In the "Individual Needs" section, the last sentence is incorrect. That is a possible accommodation a student who has an IEP under the "Deafness" IEP category. Each IEP is by definition Individualized, so there should be a rephrase of language to make it more neutral (more of a "potential accommodations are" than "the student will" in a definitive sense) and more accurate as each Deaf or Hard of Hearing student will likely have different accommodations. The below source could be used as a citation for various accommodation options: www.asha.org/Events/convention/handouts/2011/Martin-Williams-Gassen/ AlliH ( talk) 18:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)AlliH 2/5/2018
The wording of "The benefit of inclusion" appears to be biased, so I would recommend that this quote to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DPFoley1 ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
There is a variety of peer reviewed research that shows some of the negative outcomes general education settings can have on Deaf students' education and self-esteem. Some of this research could be included under the different education settings and philosophies to provide different points of view. Peer reviewed research: < https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Deaf_education&action=edit>, < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02674648966780031>, < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13603110903289982>. Ecbon ( talk) 02:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This is largely done here because while it's a question for @ Kelly222: that I might typically make on their user talk, it felt like the sort of thing that could benefit from being on the article's talk page to perhaps solicit wider discussion. (And I'm especially not wanting to revert back, both because it's not, like, some sort of disruptive edit or anything, and also then it could turn into an edit war or 3RR issue and, like... no.) So, here's the timeline of what has happened so far:
I think both of the original phrasings aren't the best (and that both may be worth having a citation attached, even if technically "stuff should be individualized" was more strongly connected to individualization related citations in the article body). And I'm not sure my phrasing was much better, though I was trying to hit some sort of middle ground between (summarized) the firm "it's individualized and monitored" (implying that's always the case in all countries) and "it could be individualized and monitored but it might not too" (covers countries where the landscape is less standardized or doesn't exist but when applied to a country where individualization and monitoring is codified in law it comes across as tendentious, like a "well, people break the law sometimes so we have to give equal weight to that").
To be honest, I've been thinking since I made my edit last night (even before the revert) that maybe it'd be easier to have a summarizing lead aspect for points like those in the previous paragraph if the article discussed them more in the body, i.e. if the national approaches section discussed more countries where the education may be piecemeal or nonexistent, or if the issues section discussed (with proper due weight and sourcing, of course) notable ways the system might have failed in countries where deaf education is more established and codified in law. (That is, the lead could be expanded without it feeling like it's giving undue weight to content that's not adequately expanded on in the article proper, since the lead is supposed to be a summary of the article, more or less.)
Hmm... might actually revert the 2019 removal of the "globalize" template, too, as the rationale for removing it was that a bunch of info about other countries was added, but virtually all the added information was for English-speaking and European countries. There needs to be more on other areas where I know deaf ed is done very differently or is more fledgling. - Purplewowies ( talk) 16:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. If there is a country or countires with legally mandated individual learning plans we should name them. It might be the case though that countries such as USA have various rules according to state (I don't know). The other issue is that individual learning plans are often inadequate and manufactured within a tick box regime that oppresses Deaf culture and language. I'm happy to removed the globe tag. Kelly222 ( talk) 05:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for explaining. Can I ask are you Deaf? If you are a hearing person you have an unusually good grasp of the issues for a hearing person. The biggest problem facing the Deaf community is Persistent Language Delay (PLD) which starts at birth because of bad ENTs wrongly telling parents that sign language will delay spoken language if the child has a cochlear implant. Here's a good article about it [1]. Also the WFD doesn't have a program targetting PLD. Kelly222 ( talk) 00:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Th4td4nc3r13 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbaer9, Dognast, Beebedell, Bellis24 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Plloren, Scino23, Skylar2002, Tooth21.
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaydenstoddard.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 29 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Kec30.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2020 and 17 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joy4heart. Peer reviewers: Akanai14, ITBillet.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wpiedra1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 19:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Please see article re-name discussion at Talk:Education_of_the_deaf#RfC:_Deciding_on_the_target_name. The outcome may have a major impact to this article's name. -- Noleander ( talk) 17:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
March.5th 2014:
I have edited an errors of spelling and grammar in this article.
/info/en/?search=User:Naiad013/sandbox — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Naiad013 (
talk •
contribs) 01:40, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
For studies of fine arts and humanities, high culture, integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior and set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes a deaf-related institution, organization or group, see deaf studies.
Seriously? On what amounts to a roadside navigation sign? Is this a sneaky satire, or the real thing?
Too bad Google translate doesn't render visual ASL as one of its output modes. I'd love to watch ten animated fingers boring themselves to death.
The opposite idea is perhaps more practical.
But this, too, could benefit from an industrial-scale cliche filter.
"We were blown away by the caliber of the submissions and the winning teams rose to the challenge by providing concepts that not only inspire marketers, but help brands connect with their customers in a way that has never been seen before."
Sadly, I'm pretty sure that's not satire, either. — MaxEnt 21:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Could this section be fleshed out with references to NIH and WHO newborn screening recommendations? In the United States, deaf education can start around 18 months, and there are early interventions for infants as soon as they are identified - this may be helpful to explain as well, but I'm not sure how it plays out in other countries. - Structure1019 ( talk) 18:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
John Bulwer, an English physician, [20] wrote five works on bodily human communication (particularly gestures). He was the first person in England to propose educating deaf people, [21] outlining plans for an academy in Philocophus and The Dumbe mans academie.
this paragraph should be merged with the Great Britain heading - Structure1019 ( talk) 18:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I notice that the section on teacher training in the United States is missing some schools that offer training for Teachers of the Deaf. It would be beneficial to add McDaniel College, Boston University, and Columbia University to that list. I believe that it is important to also stress that those programs use the bilingual-bicultural ASL-English approach—with the exception for Columbia where there is no one approach since they explore and teach about the different approaches (e.g., cued speech, oral, Total Communication, bilingual-bicultural). It might help, and maintain neutrality, to add other schools offering training for Teachers of the Deaf to that list, indicating the other approaches that they use.
Hoyalzrs ( talk) 04:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Add in the history of deaf education on how in the 1800s they main priority was to teach the deaf about God. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jparkh98 ( talk • contribs) 16:38, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
They would try to enforce that if they prayed hard enough, they would be able to hear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
I noticed the very first section of this article is a little repetitive and I saw room for improvement. The first line talks about what deaf education is and I feel it can be worded better. Such as, "deaf education is for those obtaining hearing impairments that way educators can address their differences and suit their individual needs." Also instead of saying "success in the school and community" you can say "success inside the classroom and out in the world". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jianna97circelli ( talk • contribs) 16:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I also found problem with this section of the article as "hearing impairment" as a term is technically accurate, but not the term the community of which this article is about prefers, as I have learned from my professors and friends with whom I have discussed the term. I propose something along the lines of "Deaf education is the education of those whose needs necessitate accommodations based on hearing level" or something of the sort. Accommodations within the IEP vernacular do not lessen the materials but rather change how they are presented so that the student has access to the information. Impairment implies that a person is limited, and in my experience, this does not have to be the case for Deaf or Hard of Hearing people.
AlliH (
talk) 18:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)2/5/2018 AlliH
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Deaf education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Maybe you can elaborate on two different issues about manualism and oralism also you can explain about manualism is a benefit to the students and also oralism to see if that benefit and help the students to succeed also help them develop their language acquisition. Also, you can include the organization that supports oralism or manualism and what their issue about the approaches. but I agree that this section needs to be more elaborate and more details on how both approaches is an issue for students' education.
Good to bring up the issues to see how people would add or suggestion.
-- Tylerhetu21 ( talk) 20:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
You can add more associations or organizations that combine with deaf education. here some idea or thought of an organization that helps teacher by joining this organization and this organization called "American Sign Language Teacher Association" (ASLTA). Here the link to look at it. Maybe you can expand on Deaf Education associations in international instead of focusing on two countries.
Can list of different associations from different countries.
Look good so far, -- Tylerhetu21 ( talk) 20:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Good eye, teaching ASL is not the same thing as Deaf Ed. Nor is teaching in ASL. To be considered Deaf Ed, it should be a different program for those students entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
In the "Individual Needs" section, the last sentence is incorrect. That is a possible accommodation a student who has an IEP under the "Deafness" IEP category. Each IEP is by definition Individualized, so there should be a rephrase of language to make it more neutral (more of a "potential accommodations are" than "the student will" in a definitive sense) and more accurate as each Deaf or Hard of Hearing student will likely have different accommodations. The below source could be used as a citation for various accommodation options: www.asha.org/Events/convention/handouts/2011/Martin-Williams-Gassen/ AlliH ( talk) 18:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)AlliH 2/5/2018
The wording of "The benefit of inclusion" appears to be biased, so I would recommend that this quote to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DPFoley1 ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
There is a variety of peer reviewed research that shows some of the negative outcomes general education settings can have on Deaf students' education and self-esteem. Some of this research could be included under the different education settings and philosophies to provide different points of view. Peer reviewed research: < https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Deaf_education&action=edit>, < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02674648966780031>, < https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13603110903289982>. Ecbon ( talk) 02:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
This is largely done here because while it's a question for @ Kelly222: that I might typically make on their user talk, it felt like the sort of thing that could benefit from being on the article's talk page to perhaps solicit wider discussion. (And I'm especially not wanting to revert back, both because it's not, like, some sort of disruptive edit or anything, and also then it could turn into an edit war or 3RR issue and, like... no.) So, here's the timeline of what has happened so far:
I think both of the original phrasings aren't the best (and that both may be worth having a citation attached, even if technically "stuff should be individualized" was more strongly connected to individualization related citations in the article body). And I'm not sure my phrasing was much better, though I was trying to hit some sort of middle ground between (summarized) the firm "it's individualized and monitored" (implying that's always the case in all countries) and "it could be individualized and monitored but it might not too" (covers countries where the landscape is less standardized or doesn't exist but when applied to a country where individualization and monitoring is codified in law it comes across as tendentious, like a "well, people break the law sometimes so we have to give equal weight to that").
To be honest, I've been thinking since I made my edit last night (even before the revert) that maybe it'd be easier to have a summarizing lead aspect for points like those in the previous paragraph if the article discussed them more in the body, i.e. if the national approaches section discussed more countries where the education may be piecemeal or nonexistent, or if the issues section discussed (with proper due weight and sourcing, of course) notable ways the system might have failed in countries where deaf education is more established and codified in law. (That is, the lead could be expanded without it feeling like it's giving undue weight to content that's not adequately expanded on in the article proper, since the lead is supposed to be a summary of the article, more or less.)
Hmm... might actually revert the 2019 removal of the "globalize" template, too, as the rationale for removing it was that a bunch of info about other countries was added, but virtually all the added information was for English-speaking and European countries. There needs to be more on other areas where I know deaf ed is done very differently or is more fledgling. - Purplewowies ( talk) 16:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. If there is a country or countires with legally mandated individual learning plans we should name them. It might be the case though that countries such as USA have various rules according to state (I don't know). The other issue is that individual learning plans are often inadequate and manufactured within a tick box regime that oppresses Deaf culture and language. I'm happy to removed the globe tag. Kelly222 ( talk) 05:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for explaining. Can I ask are you Deaf? If you are a hearing person you have an unusually good grasp of the issues for a hearing person. The biggest problem facing the Deaf community is Persistent Language Delay (PLD) which starts at birth because of bad ENTs wrongly telling parents that sign language will delay spoken language if the child has a cochlear implant. Here's a good article about it [1]. Also the WFD doesn't have a program targetting PLD. Kelly222 ( talk) 00:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Th4td4nc3r13 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Th4td4nc3r13 ( talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)