From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dazzled and Deceived/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaldous1 ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is well written and complies with the manual of style guidelines. I made a few small copy-edits. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is verifiable with no original research, uses reliable sources, and does not contain copyright or plagiarism issues. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is broad in coverage, but also stays focused without going into too much detail.
  • The article is netural.
  • The article is is stable.
  • The article is illustrated and contains some nice images.

I say this article is a Good Article. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply



GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Dazzled and Deceived in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to [[User_talk:|jaldous1]] with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Jaldous1 ( talk) 17:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
· · ·
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dazzled and Deceived/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaldous1 ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is well written and complies with the manual of style guidelines. I made a few small copy-edits. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is verifiable with no original research, uses reliable sources, and does not contain copyright or plagiarism issues. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • The article is broad in coverage, but also stays focused without going into too much detail.
  • The article is netural.
  • The article is is stable.
  • The article is illustrated and contains some nice images.

I say this article is a Good Article. -- Jaldous1 ( talk) 19:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply



GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Dazzled and Deceived in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to [[User_talk:|jaldous1]] with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Jaldous1 ( talk) 17:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
· · ·

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook