This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dave Asprey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It looks like Dave's fans have discovered the new article and would like to see it updated, but are clueless about such things as WP:V and WP:RS. I'll try to keep it objective and sourced. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
I have tagged one paragraph for neutrality problems, as its main purpose seems to debunk, rather than describe, Mr. Asprey's theory on diet. -- Gertanis ( talk) 00:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The whole "Reception" section is entirely biased. It lists only negative criticism and some, neutral. The *principle* of _neutrality_ means that every negative must be weighed up by one positive. It is not hard to find dieters who have tried and found weight reduction on the BP diet and worst of all, the clear anti-Asprey bias occupies useful space for more *relevant* criticism of Asprey. Like disseminating knowledge about problems with foods, but at the same time offering his own products as the "best alternative" (see the BP diet roadmap,
link , many of the green foods are his own products).
Note: the roadmap in the link is incomplete, there are more examples
Addeps3 ( talk) 11:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Dave Asprey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It looks like Dave's fans have discovered the new article and would like to see it updated, but are clueless about such things as WP:V and WP:RS. I'll try to keep it objective and sourced. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
I have tagged one paragraph for neutrality problems, as its main purpose seems to debunk, rather than describe, Mr. Asprey's theory on diet. -- Gertanis ( talk) 00:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The whole "Reception" section is entirely biased. It lists only negative criticism and some, neutral. The *principle* of _neutrality_ means that every negative must be weighed up by one positive. It is not hard to find dieters who have tried and found weight reduction on the BP diet and worst of all, the clear anti-Asprey bias occupies useful space for more *relevant* criticism of Asprey. Like disseminating knowledge about problems with foods, but at the same time offering his own products as the "best alternative" (see the BP diet roadmap,
link , many of the green foods are his own products).
Note: the roadmap in the link is incomplete, there are more examples
Addeps3 ( talk) 11:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)