This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mythology C‑class Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ancient Near East Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Syria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Phoenicia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Danel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Ugaritic culture hero Danel may have been a model for the Biblical Daniel of Ezekiel? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

• Content: The article says he appears in a 14th century BCE text, but nothing about what is known or supposed of his origins. Is he considered invented at that time? Invented much earlier? Based on a real person and gradually mythified? Or is it just established that nothing is known about that? I think it should be explicited, even if as a single sentence.

• Form: As you may know, since you are the first main contributor of this article, Wikipedia rule is that you have the right to choose/dictate the citation style used in the article (now I feel like I'm Mirandazing you ;-) That's why I'll just explain a suggested change in the format of your References section: since you use refs such as "Walton 1994" or "Day 1980", it would be easier on the reader to switch to an author-date format, such as:

• Walton, John H. (1994). Ancient Israelite Literature in Its Cultural Context: A Survey of Parallels, "Personal Archives and Epics": Canaanite .2 (Zondervan), p. 49.

It makes it easier to find a given ref, especially when a same author starts having multiple works cited. As you may be aware, there are also the handy {{ Cite book}} and {{ Cite web}} templates that implement APA or Harvard. (And if you feel adventurous, you can have a look at the Harvard/MLA hybrid I used on Emir Rodríguez Monegal ;-))

But of course, the citation format is your prerogative on this article. —  Komusou  ^talk @ 17:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

The Hebrew Wiki article says that in the past this was called the Legend of Danel, but that in light of new discoveries, they now consider Aqhat to predominate and that the name was changed accordingly. Can anyone confirm? Many thanks in advance. El_C 02:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC) reply

The article mentions the Epic of Aqhat, which is a link to the 'Aqhat' article, which redirects to Danel, this same article. This is a little strange, was this the intention? :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.212.120 ( talk) 18:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC) reply

That link to gold got removed, because it is unrelated to Danel, and constitutes abuse.

Why is this not here.: "in both Ugaritic and Hebrew texts, it is correctly Danel" as shown in the article Ugaritic. Misty MH ( talk) 18:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply