This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
The content, as first added by Special:Diff/755869236 had no context to relate to the company. It rather an ongoing COI edit to advertise the company from Bangladesh and Iran ( User:Nimabba, User:Enik). Matthew_hk t c 14:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I am Caitlyn23 and I would like to request, as a declared COI editor, an addition to the Cybersecurity vulnerabilities sub-section. Please update the section at the end of the last paragraph with the following addition: "In March 2021, the Federal Communications Commission designated a group of companies, including Dahua, as posing “an unacceptable risk to U.S. national security. Some news sources have called this risk into question arguing, as The Intercept explains, that “the U.S. government has not provided the public with any evidence that Dahua and Hikvision are spying on customers.” [1]
References
Thank you kindly for your help. Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I am working to expand the article with additional informative content. Because of my COI, I am not editing the page myself. I would appreciate review and implementation of the following suggested additions:
References
Of course, I'd be happy to hear any feedback or suggestions. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In a continued effort to improve the article, I'd like to suggest the following additions and changes to the content:
References
I appreciate your assistance in completing these edits and enhancing the encyclopedic value of the article, as my COI prevents me from doing so myself. Rlink2, I am grateful for your help with my prior edit request. Would you have a look and implement if all looks good? Happy to hear any feedback you may have. Thanks, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 23:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
Hi, as I continue to work on expanding the article and improving its structure, I am suggesting the following additions and changes: * At the end of the Partnerships section, add the following sentence: The Schwarze Berge Wildlife Park in Rosengarten, Germany, uses Dahua camera systems to provide security. [1]
* An edit from my previous request which was inadvertently left out: Remove the subsection entitled "Security Industry Association expulsion" and move its contents into History, above the sentence which begins "In November 2021...," ensuring the article remains in line with WP:STRUCTURE.
References
I appreciate your assistance. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 21:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
An edit was recently made to the infobox of the article, adding "state-owned enterprise" to the Type parameter. Similarly, the first line of the lead describes Dahua as "a partially state-owned publicly-traded company." Although some state-owned companies do hold shares in Dahua (a public company), that does not make Dahua a "state-owned enterprise" or a "partially state-owned" company by any definition (see this document from the IMF, specifically the first footnote, for how a SOE is defined). I am requesting assistance from the community to remove these terms in the infobox and the lead, as I am not editing myself due to my COI. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 00:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
As I continue to work on adding content to the article, I have a few more suggestions: In History: * After the sentence which begins "In November 2021," add the following sentence: :In late 2021, Dahua provided an electronic security system to processed food company Empresa Panamena de Alimentos (EPA) in Panama. [1] * At the end of the section, after the sentence which begins with "In June 2022," add the following sentence: :In October 2022, the company hosted Dahua Partner Day in Paris, France, where the company enabled conversation between partners, customers, and the manufacturer, and presented new products. [2] In Corporate affairs: *In the subsection Partnerships, add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph: :In August 2022, Dahua partnered with ABCOM Distribution LLC for a distribution partnership in MENA. [3] I am happy to hear any feedback, and would appreciate assistance in implementing these edits. Rlink2 Thank you very much for your help with my previous requests. If these suggestions look good to you, would you please add them? Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
References
Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I have a few suggestions to further improve the encyclopedic value and accuracy of the article:
I appreciate the community's review and implementation of these suggested edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 23:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In light of Dahua's recent sale of its subsidiary Lorex, I'd like to suggest a couple of edits:
I'd appreciate the community's assistance in performing these edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC) Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I'd like to suggest adding the following new content to the article:
At the end of History, add:
Under Partnerships, add:
I'd be happy to hear feedback on these suggestions, and would appreciate your assistance in adding the content. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
References
Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I'd like to suggest adding the following to the end of the History section:
In March 2023, Dahua sold $740 million in new stock to China Mobile, closing a deal which had been announced two years earlier. [1] As a result, China Mobile holds a minority stake of 8.8% in Dahua. [2]
References
I would appreciate assistance in implementing this edit. Thanks! Caitlyn23 ( talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit request implemented Spintendo 01:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. "A small minority of state ownership" is justified, but there is neither a justification for suppressing information about state ownershiop entirely, as requested, nor the opposite extreme of implying that it is more than it is (with vague wording like "partially state-owned"). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
The Type parameter in the infobox currently includes the term "state-owned enterprise" and the first line of the lead describes Dahua as "a partly state-owned publicly traded company". Although some state-owned companies do hold shares in Dahua (a public company), that does not make Dahua a "state-owned enterprise" or a "partly state-owned" company by any definition (see this document from the IMF, specifically the first footnote, for how a SOE is defined).
This was addressed in an old discussion at the time the edits were made. The language was removed and then reinstated by the editor who had first added it. There was support that the terminology was not fitting but no further action had been taken. As per the advice given, I tried engaging other editors who had previously been involved in the discussion and/or article, but did not receive any responses. Therefore, as requested, I have opened a new edit request to address the issue of the incorrect terminology. I would appreciate your assistance in removing the terms from the infobox and the lead. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
As per the advice given, I tried engaging other editors who had previously been involved in the discussion and/or article, but did not receive any responses.Unfortunately, because the issue has shown to be controversial in the past, a consensus must be achieved before any changes can be carried out. [1] That requires the COI editor to continue reaching out to local editors in order to find those who may be willing to assist in this endeavor. Once that discussion is completed, only then should the COI editor invoke the
{{
Edit COI}}
template to have a neutral editor make any agreed-upon changes.References
Instructions for Reviewers: Do not insert major re-writes or controversial requests without clear consensus. When these are requested, ask the submitter to discuss the edits instead with regular contributors on the article's talk page.
Regards, Spintendo 03:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
{{
diff}}
of editors stating that they are in agreement with this, then we can proceed, something along the line like this:
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, please update the last sentence under the subsection Shareholders (in the Corporate affairs section) with the current information and source, as follows:
References
Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Approved Because information regarding China Mobile's acquisition of a 10.42% stake in March 2021 was already mentioned, this information regarding the additional 8.8% stake was appended therein. Regards, Spintendo 19:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, please add the following to the end of the Shareholders subsection in Corporate affairs:
In March 2023, Dahua sold $740 million in new stock to China Mobile, closing a deal which had been announced two years earlier. [1] As a result, China Mobile holds a minority stake of 8.8% in Dahua. [2]
References
I appreciate your assistance. Thank you! Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
According to the article, the US trade association IPVM has expelled the non-US company that is the subject of the article, but various negative statements about the subject still use IPVM as the source. The expulsion and that the organization now probably consists mostly of competitors to the subject seems to create a conflict of interest that I believe should make them a less reliable source on the subject. As a neutral reader, I believe that they should be replaced by independent sources . 2A01:4F0:4018:F0:1DC3:B330:52E0:BECE ( talk) 09:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In a continued effort to update the page, the following are suggestions to add to the end of the History section:
References
Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Dahua Technology. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, I have a few more suggested updates for History. Please add the following at the end of the section, after the paragraph which begins "In 2022,...": * ISR International School on the Rhine has been using Dahua's DeepHub whiteboards since 2022. [1] *Dahua Technology provided technical support and smart applications for Yellow Dragon Sports Center during the 2022 Asian Games. [2] *In July 2023, Dahua Technology signed an agreement with the Semper Altius School Network and the Anáhuac High School Network in Mexico, committing to supply about 2,500 video surveillance cameras in more than 60 educational institutions. [3]
References
Pinging JArthur1984 since you assisted with the previous edit request. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 21:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Dahua Technology. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, an edit was made to the lead a few months back describing one of the roles of Fu Liquan as "Chinese Communist Party Committee Secretary". This is a position which exists in most China-based large or global companies, and is not unique to Fu or especially relevant to Dahua. Given this context, and the fact that sources overwhelmingly refer to him as chairman, president, or founder (in fact, I have found that only the current source calls him party secretary), the current inclusion in the lead offers a false balance between his role as chairman of the company and party secretary, and misrepresents how the sources characterize him. As such, please consider removing this title from the lead.
JArthur1984, perhaps you have thoughts on this matter? Thanks very much. Caitlyn23 ( talk) 19:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
The content, as first added by Special:Diff/755869236 had no context to relate to the company. It rather an ongoing COI edit to advertise the company from Bangladesh and Iran ( User:Nimabba, User:Enik). Matthew_hk t c 14:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I am Caitlyn23 and I would like to request, as a declared COI editor, an addition to the Cybersecurity vulnerabilities sub-section. Please update the section at the end of the last paragraph with the following addition: "In March 2021, the Federal Communications Commission designated a group of companies, including Dahua, as posing “an unacceptable risk to U.S. national security. Some news sources have called this risk into question arguing, as The Intercept explains, that “the U.S. government has not provided the public with any evidence that Dahua and Hikvision are spying on customers.” [1]
References
Thank you kindly for your help. Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I am working to expand the article with additional informative content. Because of my COI, I am not editing the page myself. I would appreciate review and implementation of the following suggested additions:
References
Of course, I'd be happy to hear any feedback or suggestions. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In a continued effort to improve the article, I'd like to suggest the following additions and changes to the content:
References
I appreciate your assistance in completing these edits and enhancing the encyclopedic value of the article, as my COI prevents me from doing so myself. Rlink2, I am grateful for your help with my prior edit request. Would you have a look and implement if all looks good? Happy to hear any feedback you may have. Thanks, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 23:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
Hi, as I continue to work on expanding the article and improving its structure, I am suggesting the following additions and changes: * At the end of the Partnerships section, add the following sentence: The Schwarze Berge Wildlife Park in Rosengarten, Germany, uses Dahua camera systems to provide security. [1]
* An edit from my previous request which was inadvertently left out: Remove the subsection entitled "Security Industry Association expulsion" and move its contents into History, above the sentence which begins "In November 2021...," ensuring the article remains in line with WP:STRUCTURE.
References
I appreciate your assistance. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 21:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first. |
An edit was recently made to the infobox of the article, adding "state-owned enterprise" to the Type parameter. Similarly, the first line of the lead describes Dahua as "a partially state-owned publicly-traded company." Although some state-owned companies do hold shares in Dahua (a public company), that does not make Dahua a "state-owned enterprise" or a "partially state-owned" company by any definition (see this document from the IMF, specifically the first footnote, for how a SOE is defined). I am requesting assistance from the community to remove these terms in the infobox and the lead, as I am not editing myself due to my COI. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 00:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
As I continue to work on adding content to the article, I have a few more suggestions: In History: * After the sentence which begins "In November 2021," add the following sentence: :In late 2021, Dahua provided an electronic security system to processed food company Empresa Panamena de Alimentos (EPA) in Panama. [1] * At the end of the section, after the sentence which begins with "In June 2022," add the following sentence: :In October 2022, the company hosted Dahua Partner Day in Paris, France, where the company enabled conversation between partners, customers, and the manufacturer, and presented new products. [2] In Corporate affairs: *In the subsection Partnerships, add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph: :In August 2022, Dahua partnered with ABCOM Distribution LLC for a distribution partnership in MENA. [3] I am happy to hear any feedback, and would appreciate assistance in implementing these edits. Rlink2 Thank you very much for your help with my previous requests. If these suggestions look good to you, would you please add them? Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
References
Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I have a few suggestions to further improve the encyclopedic value and accuracy of the article:
I appreciate the community's review and implementation of these suggested edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 23:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In light of Dahua's recent sale of its subsidiary Lorex, I'd like to suggest a couple of edits:
I'd appreciate the community's assistance in performing these edits. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC) Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I'd like to suggest adding the following new content to the article:
At the end of History, add:
Under Partnerships, add:
I'd be happy to hear feedback on these suggestions, and would appreciate your assistance in adding the content. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
References
Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I'd like to suggest adding the following to the end of the History section:
In March 2023, Dahua sold $740 million in new stock to China Mobile, closing a deal which had been announced two years earlier. [1] As a result, China Mobile holds a minority stake of 8.8% in Dahua. [2]
References
I would appreciate assistance in implementing this edit. Thanks! Caitlyn23 ( talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit request implemented Spintendo 01:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. "A small minority of state ownership" is justified, but there is neither a justification for suppressing information about state ownershiop entirely, as requested, nor the opposite extreme of implying that it is more than it is (with vague wording like "partially state-owned"). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 22:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
The Type parameter in the infobox currently includes the term "state-owned enterprise" and the first line of the lead describes Dahua as "a partly state-owned publicly traded company". Although some state-owned companies do hold shares in Dahua (a public company), that does not make Dahua a "state-owned enterprise" or a "partly state-owned" company by any definition (see this document from the IMF, specifically the first footnote, for how a SOE is defined).
This was addressed in an old discussion at the time the edits were made. The language was removed and then reinstated by the editor who had first added it. There was support that the terminology was not fitting but no further action had been taken. As per the advice given, I tried engaging other editors who had previously been involved in the discussion and/or article, but did not receive any responses. Therefore, as requested, I have opened a new edit request to address the issue of the incorrect terminology. I would appreciate your assistance in removing the terms from the infobox and the lead. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
As per the advice given, I tried engaging other editors who had previously been involved in the discussion and/or article, but did not receive any responses.Unfortunately, because the issue has shown to be controversial in the past, a consensus must be achieved before any changes can be carried out. [1] That requires the COI editor to continue reaching out to local editors in order to find those who may be willing to assist in this endeavor. Once that discussion is completed, only then should the COI editor invoke the
{{
Edit COI}}
template to have a neutral editor make any agreed-upon changes.References
Instructions for Reviewers: Do not insert major re-writes or controversial requests without clear consensus. When these are requested, ask the submitter to discuss the edits instead with regular contributors on the article's talk page.
Regards, Spintendo 03:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
{{
diff}}
of editors stating that they are in agreement with this, then we can proceed, something along the line like this:
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, please update the last sentence under the subsection Shareholders (in the Corporate affairs section) with the current information and source, as follows:
References
Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Approved Because information regarding China Mobile's acquisition of a 10.42% stake in March 2021 was already mentioned, this information regarding the additional 8.8% stake was appended therein. Regards, Spintendo 19:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
References
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, please add the following to the end of the Shareholders subsection in Corporate affairs:
In March 2023, Dahua sold $740 million in new stock to China Mobile, closing a deal which had been announced two years earlier. [1] As a result, China Mobile holds a minority stake of 8.8% in Dahua. [2]
References
I appreciate your assistance. Thank you! Caitlyn23 ( talk) 18:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
According to the article, the US trade association IPVM has expelled the non-US company that is the subject of the article, but various negative statements about the subject still use IPVM as the source. The expulsion and that the organization now probably consists mostly of competitors to the subject seems to create a conflict of interest that I believe should make them a less reliable source on the subject. As a neutral reader, I believe that they should be replaced by independent sources . 2A01:4F0:4018:F0:1DC3:B330:52E0:BECE ( talk) 09:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
In a continued effort to update the page, the following are suggestions to add to the end of the History section:
References
Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 17:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Dahua Technology. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, I have a few more suggested updates for History. Please add the following at the end of the section, after the paragraph which begins "In 2022,...": * ISR International School on the Rhine has been using Dahua's DeepHub whiteboards since 2022. [1] *Dahua Technology provided technical support and smart applications for Yellow Dragon Sports Center during the 2022 Asian Games. [2] *In July 2023, Dahua Technology signed an agreement with the Semper Altius School Network and the Anáhuac High School Network in Mexico, committing to supply about 2,500 video surveillance cameras in more than 60 educational institutions. [3]
References
Pinging JArthur1984 since you assisted with the previous edit request. Thank you, Caitlyn23 ( talk) 21:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
The user below has a request that an edit be made to
Dahua Technology. That user has an
actual or apparent
conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi, an edit was made to the lead a few months back describing one of the roles of Fu Liquan as "Chinese Communist Party Committee Secretary". This is a position which exists in most China-based large or global companies, and is not unique to Fu or especially relevant to Dahua. Given this context, and the fact that sources overwhelmingly refer to him as chairman, president, or founder (in fact, I have found that only the current source calls him party secretary), the current inclusion in the lead offers a false balance between his role as chairman of the company and party secretary, and misrepresents how the sources characterize him. As such, please consider removing this title from the lead.
JArthur1984, perhaps you have thoughts on this matter? Thanks very much. Caitlyn23 ( talk) 19:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)