This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Law Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

• Yes to merge penal to criminal code -- Mashra ( talk) 19:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC) reply
• No to merge penal to criminal code --[User:BrettBell] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett.I.Bell ( talk • contribs) 01:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• I'd like to support a merger, although I'm surprised that the nominator failed to give any reasons. Penal code is simply another way of sating criminal code, albeit in a somewhat more arcane manner. Having two separate articles makes no sense. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 14:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Criminal code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704025812/http://195.83.177.9/upl/pdf/table_33.pdf to http://195.83.177.9/upl/pdf/table_33.pdf
• Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090416025930/http%3A//www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/newsletter_spring_2009.pdf to http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/newsletter_spring_2009.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070724004724/http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/codification.htm to http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/codification.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply